Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New QLogic (ANCR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: doc who wrote (22205)	6/1/1999 8:40:00 PM
From: George Dawson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 29386

"i've come to realize one should consider all possibilities no matter how positive or negative. and if you only listen to company ir, you'll be the last to know." doc, That's true - but in my experience with the Ancor internet threads - no matter who you listen to - you'll still be the last to know. George D.

To: doc who wrote (22205)	6/1/1999 8:42:00 PM
From: Jim Withers	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 29386

Doc; I have to agree with Kerry on this one. The ancor_prophet does sound like a short. He may not be. I may be all wet. But, he has started his own rumors e.g. big meeting in San Jose sun will shine etc. followed by todays post "Can anyone confirm negative news I have heard regarding the recent weather reports? I was under the impression sunny skies were close (within 3-4 weeks), but now I'm not so sure". How are we supposed to have confirmation on the status of a rumor he started? It's a classic shorter's modus operandi. Inflate the hopes of the weak/scared/greedy minded, then, stick a pin in the balloon and watch it deflate. If I am wrong about ancor_prophet then I apologize. However, if he is truly a concerned ANCR long, he should rethink his statements. Don't get me wrong. I firmly believe genuine concerns about the company should be brought to light and discussed. But rumors and "inside" information isn't a fair way to judge the company's success or lack thereof. Jim