Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: woodside who wrote (21392)	6/1/1999 10:32:00 PM
From: MileHigh	Respond to of 93625

woodside, Unbelievable!! All RMBS investors should read those posts. That's like Edelstone or Dan Niles going on YHOO to defend themselves. Very National Enquirerish to me.. This is getting very messy and manipulated. Sort of like a soap opera. He says IBM did not deny the story but tonights news clearly contains an IBM spokesperson denial. It is all just too bizarre to me! But I have not been at this as long as some. Are the stakes that high!? If they are, sign up on SI and post to a more educated audience. MileHigh

To: woodside who wrote (21392)	6/1/1999 10:45:00 PM
From: richard surckla	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Willett-EN's editor in chief: Looks to me like this guy (if he is real) is trying to justify and coverup his mistake in the manner in which he printed the IBM news by excluding some very important information like IBM continuing to use Rambus in their high end products. If the article were true why would he come to the Yahoo board to defend his position and the way the article was written. Reporters, editors, etc. don't do that. They don't try to sell themselves on how right they were after they write a story. Something is not right here. Either he's an imposter or he's scared s*&tless of some possible backlash, exactly what I don't know. JMHO