SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stock bull who wrote (130316)6/2/1999 12:10:00 AM
From: Gold Beach  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 176387
 
Stock Bull:
<The box business is a tough one.>

Recently I received an article in the mail from Edward Jones. Their article entitled "Follow the Bandwidth Rainbow" suggests that technology is evolving major emphasis from PCs to Communications Networks. They say that the Internet is changing the PC from a computational device to a communications vehicle. My interpretation of the article is that bandwidth is the new scarcity and thus companies that resolve that problem are the ones to own stock in. They suggest that Intel, Microsoft and Dell will benefit to a lesser degree from the paradigm than other communications-oriented companies.



To: stock bull who wrote (130316)6/2/1999 12:11:00 AM
From: kemble s. matter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
stock bull,
Hi!!! FURTHER CONSOLIDATION???

RE: The box business is a tough one...Just ask COMPAQ

And, I see DELL making it a very very very tough one for all the others...Further consolidation perhaps?

J

02:52pm EDT 25-May-99 PaineWebber (Young, Don 203-978-9100) CPQ HWP IBM
DELL GT

PC Hardware
PaineWebber
Don Young
RESEARCH NOTE

May 25, 1999

Compaq Computer Rating:
Neutral
(CPQ-$25.06)
COMPAQ: GIVING UP? IS THE DOOR OPEN FOR DELL?
CONFERENCE CALL WED, 11 AM WITH CHANNEL EXECUTIVE -- SEE PW REP FOR
DETAILS

KEY POINTS

* Two weeks after Compaq's new distribution announcement, we are more
worried
about the action and what the strategy may signal.

* It appears that Compaq has completely dis-intermediated the dealer
while
greatly enhancing the distributor's position (at least the four
distributors
that were selected). Probably directly attributable to Compaq's
actions,
there has been a wholesale exit from the hardware dealer business as
displayed by Entex and GE ITS recent divestitures. The dealer
"touches" the
customer - the distributor does not. Because of Compaq's actions the
dealer
will be less loyal.

* The strength of the Direct channel model is the integration of the
brand and
the channel as Dell ($36.13)(2) & GTW($61.44)(3) have so successfully
done -
this is a move in the opposite direction.

* We are lost to explain this action beyond Compaq management giving up
on
establishing an efficient distribution model on their own and instead
turning
to the distributor for that role. We believe Compaq will pay the
distributors 1-2% of revenues for handling the product and is hoping
this
"simplification" will pay back in higher channel inventory turns. We
estimate
that Compaq has to reduce current channel inventories from 4 weeks to
two
weeks to justify this move. And that assumes Compaq does not lose
any sales
through the dealer channel (unlikely).

* We believe this distribution function is too important and an
integral part
of the value-added chain in the PC business model to be outsourced.
To put it
bluntly - Dell does not use distributors for system sales and never
will.

* This Compaq action also creates a temporary channel inventory
problem. There
is now a need to liquidate all the inventory that was in the dealers
hands.
One week of channel inventory is equal to 8% of sales in the quarter
with
Compaq wanting to reduce another 2 weeks from channel inventory over
the next
few quarters. If the channel inventory reduction is achieved by the
August 1
implementation date, Compaq could undermine its North American
quarterly
sales rate by 15% or over $500 million ($.05/share).

* This also creates the opportunity for the dealer to shift his
allegiance to
the Direct channel. The dealer no longer has a vested interested in
promoting Compaq product sales - the dealer is being pushed out of
the
hardware business. The dealer is free to provide his service
capabilities to
Dell customers and be viewed as less of a threat by Dell since the
dealer has
little financial dependency on Compaq hardware sales and is less
likely to
try to substitute Compaq for Dell product. Compaq has just opened
its entire
dealer base to Dell.

* This creates a long term threat that the distributor channel will
eventually
be in the position to dis-intermediate Compaq. If the essence of a
PC
company is logistics and Compaq has outsourced a big part of
logistics to the
distributors - the distributors can eventually cut out Compaq.

* We remain concerned about the outlook for PC hardware industry. We
believe
these recent distribution moves by Compaq are a step in the wrong
direction,
will aggravate the already poor industry pricing environment and
potentially
set-up Compaq to lose control over the distribution channel. We
doubt HWP &
IBM will follow Compaq on this move.

* What should Compaq have done? We would have been more comfortable if
Compact
reduced its dependency on distributors for the logistics and
distribution of
its products. Be more Direct. Direct to the Dealer & VAR. Direct
to the
end-user.

* We are maintaining our Compaq estimates for now - but there is risk
that PC
sales could be reduced by 8% or more in the June quarter if Compaq
moves
quickly to liquidate dealer inventories. However, we believe Compaq
shares
are not trading on the basis of near term earnings. And our concerns
over
this new distribution strategy are more strategic and longer term in
nature.
We continue to recommend investors under-weigh the PC hardware group.