Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : NCDR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Q. who wrote (503)	6/2/1999 1:17:00 AM
From: Q.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1440

correction to previous post Upon reconsidering the numbers, I haven't read "a couple of thousand 10Q's". It's probably closer to about 800 of them, that I've read. My apologies for the error.

To: Q. who wrote (503)	6/2/1999 8:37:00 AM
From: Arthur_Porcari	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1440

John, I am fully aware of the new rules. As you can see from your own link, the rule does not come into effect for NCT until January, 2000. The "old rule" is still in effect. They did not have to file a 10q at this time. So once again I am right of course. I have already addressed the Telnet/Baraka assets aquisition. It is was in fact properly disclosed per SEC rules. No one is questioning that the Prior shell management was, to kindly state, sloppy at best in its compliance. Chalnik as CFO, has only been on board less then 3 months. If you are so familiar with SEC filings, you must agree that to file three years worth of 10k's and near a dozen quarterlies in this short period of time is an almost incomprehensible task. How many BB companies do you know that can't even get one 10k filed in a year? I suspect that those who insist on focusing in the past, will soon be blindsided by the present. Art