Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Marco Polo who wrote (60222)	6/2/1999 1:14:00 AM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571158

Re: "the K7 beats the Coppermine though... fair is fair. " Oh this just keeps getting better and better. Claims totally lacking in supporting data. You have really found a home here. You fit in perfectly! EP

To: Marco Polo who wrote (60222)	6/2/1999 1:50:00 AM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571158

Bennie D - Re: "Why don't we all just admit that the Celeron beats the K6-2 hands down so that we don't debate that one anymore... " Agreed - every body and his brother has proven that ! Re: " ... the K7 beats the Coppermine though... fair is fair. " Interesting ! The only published data on K7 benchmarks shows the K7 is about as fast as a Pentium /// running at a 50 MHz handicap - except on FPU benchmarks - where the slower Pentium /// knocks the socks off the K7 - and you claim this data "isn't real" ! By the way - perhaps you can post a link to the Coppermine benchmarks? Paul