SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Global Crossing - GX (formerly GBLX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sawtooth who wrote (1052)6/2/1999 2:15:00 PM
From: LJM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15615
 
From what I have read, at the time of the merger each share of GBLX and USW common stock shall be converted to Parent Class A or B common stock or a combination of both according to a pre-set conversion (defined below) and based on your election selections. The clincher is if everyone chooses one class (Global for example) this could exceed the cap, then the number of shares exceeding the cap will be reduced pro rata. I see this as the biggest problem with 2 classes of stock. Who is going to choose the USW shares??? Not me!

FWIW>>>The conversion ratio is determined by dividing the total number of shares of Global Common Stock outstanding on the date of the Merger Agreement less 39,259,305, divided by the total number of shares of USW Common Stock outstanding on the date of the Merger Agreement. For the purpose of calculating the conversion ratio above, the number of outstanding shares of Global Common STock outstanding on the date of the Merger Agreement includes the number of shares of Global Common Stock to be issued in exchange for Frontier shares according to the terms of the Global/Frontier Merger Agreement.

Now that I have read more, I may tender after all. I really do not like this idea of 2 classes of stock.

Any thoughts on this?

LJM



To: Sawtooth who wrote (1052)6/2/1999 2:19:00 PM
From: jerryriti  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 15615
 
Please, anyone clarify the downside of accepting the tender. You will receive $62.75 for a percent of the shares tendered (anywhere from 10-17% of the shares you tender based on the #s projected,.i.e., self imposed restrictions on the insiders for tendering their shares and general passivity of many shareholders). Assuming that you are then left with 83-90% of your original shares which can then be used to acquire the tracking stock of your choice, can anyone highlight any scenario under which tendering does not make sense. Take whatever liberties you wish, as I am bemused by what seems a no brainer and a clear cut sweetener for the GBLX shareholder! Is the assumption that the price will rise above the tender offer of $62.75? Could use some feedback as I am feeling too positive about my perception in light of so many who seem to be choosing the non-tender route!



To: Sawtooth who wrote (1052)6/3/1999 1:37:00 PM
From: Robert Sheldon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15615
 
*I can hardly imagine this is good for the general shareholders. I run into a lot of people who are interested in the GBLX story. But when we get to the part about the allocation of G vs. L shares, tracking stocks, etc., a frequent reaction is *oh, never mind*.*

Good. The more folks who do not understand the deal the better . . . it sure is nice to get to 20% discount to the consummation of the merger.