Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : THNS - Technest Holdings (Prev. FNTN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: De Peepster who wrote (12686)	6/2/1999 4:04:00 PM
From: BHunt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15313

RE <Any thoughts to what has changed...> I dont think anything has changed. I cant begin to understand how you can draw the conclusion that something has to have changed for FNTN to be "preparing" to ramp up the video segment of their business! MS said that an enterprise with their own video setup could arrange a webcast now with little delay. That would tend to be a larger company in my judgment. Well qualified to pay? I think so! Webcasts with FNTN would require more time to market on the part of the client than time to prepare on FNTN's side. That's good news. As to smaller entities, it appears that FNTN intends to make this possible as well with equipment provided to those clients which I assume would create extra revenue. This appears to be part of their developing plan to implement a wide variety of client services. Your slant implies that you would have either hyped video services without reservation in the filing, or that you would not have mentioned them at all because they were not yet in place. Do you think either would be sound or prudent judgment for a management bent on producing a successful filing AND on advancing the possibilities for the companies future? A filing is about doing BOTH of these things. I feel their language fits very very well with MS comments about their stated plan. BHunt

To: De Peepster who wrote (12686)	6/2/1999 5:11:00 PM
From: DesertRat1	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 15313

Peep, I'm not sure I understand what you are asking but the text from the SB2 form that you posted is talking about the intranet (and client's ability to access info). I think most of the talk today about the Joe T. future "talks" is for the internet side of the business (for the public). I didn't hear Radim or Tman say much in reguard (or related to) to the text you posted, so I'm not sure they can answer (nor I). And one thing I've learned in my short experience as an SI person, never think you are oversimplifying your questions or responses by being wordy because if you don't someone is bound to take it the wrong way. And lets face it, your a marked woman around here :-) DRat.