SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DMaA who wrote (51317)6/2/1999 4:21:00 PM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 67261
 
Go, Dick, Go! We'll run against Gephardt, regardless of the presidential candidate....LOL! what a moron!



To: DMaA who wrote (51317)6/2/1999 4:23:00 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Excellent. Repubs will now be guaranteed to take all three elective branches in 2000. Just like I told Dipy several months ago.



To: DMaA who wrote (51317)6/2/1999 4:28:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
"I'd be proud to vote for tax increases for schools. You bet I would…"

Me too, especially in this context of discussion where some conservatives here think private school is a must.



To: DMaA who wrote (51317)6/2/1999 4:33:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Only good thing I can say about Gephardt is that his last election was close. He's had a virtual lock on that seat, but more and more I think he's wearing thin. I'm just glad I'm the next district over. I wish you could have seen his election ads, such a joke.

bp