testing
copy and paste practice, experimenting
excuse the last posting as Use Fixed Font was selected and shouldn't be
john
SI
Inbox (1) | Folders
Bookmarks | People
Hot | New Subjects
Options | Profile
My Industrial - e-commerce - [New]
Talk : Coffee Shop: Yorkton...GUILTY or NOT GUILY of Stock Manipulation
Quote - Chart - News - Earnings
Subject (Replies: 45)
Started By: SirVinny
Date: May 2 1999 3:51AM ET
After being the underwriters of BID.COM on three occasions and profiting from the sale of options as the stock
price of BID.COM rose to $32.35, analyst Mark Pavan of Yorkton Securities shocked investors across North
America as they released a stunning report suggesting that the stock which they so enthusiastically pushed only days
before was worth no more than $2 to $3 CDN. This came only one day after BID.COM was listed on the
NASDAQ.
Even more stunning was that in the hours that ensued the massive selloff which saw the stock drop to $8.50,
Yorkton was one of the most active buyers of BID.COM shares at prices considerably greater than the $2 to $3 they
claimed the stock was worth.
Is this a blatant example of stock manipulation ? Was Mark Pavan's report irresponsible ? Was Yorkton's actions
suspicious ? Was there a motivation for this untimely report ? Do you think this merits an investigation ? Do you
think shareholders were cheated ? Or is this simply the way the game is played ?
This thread allows you to post your comments and opinions on whether or not you think Yorkton Securities is
Guilty or Not Guilty of stock manipulation.
| All Replies | Respond |
stockhouse.com
#1, SirVinny, May 2 1999 4:02AM
Guilty !!!!!!!!!!!!!
#2, Chuck, May 2 1999 7:56PM
Yorkton's wrong doing's go waaaaay back, but that's not News :(
#3, David in Ontario, May 3 1999 12:47AM
He was obviously long sold at lower levels and got caught short and to save hi
#4, Anthony@Pacific, May 3 1999 2:46AM
Wow! This is amazing. So many creepy people in the world. How could he do t
#5, Lola, May 3 1999 9:05AM
There is and we will.
#6, Anthony@Pacific, May 3 1999 9:15AM
I'll be cheering for you. You go Anthony!! Lola:)eom
#7, Lola, May 3 1999 9:17AM
New York Law firm STULL, STULL & BRODY is looking into a possible class
#8, SirVinny, May 3 1999 5:30PM
Great work SirVinny, don't let the bad guys win!!eom
#9, Lola, May 3 1999 6:50PM
The SEC or Canadian equivalent should at the very least review the situation t
#10, Tiger USA, May 3 1999 9:15PM
Vinny.....GREAT THREAD !
#11, Steelguy, May 3 1999 10:48PM
Anthony......
#12, Steelguy, May 3 1999 10:51PM
Thanks and I know that some very idiotic shorts can buzz around smelly stocks
#13, Anthony@Pacific, May 3 1999 11:25PM
SG, ....DEWEY, CHEATEM, AND HOWE.... LOL LOL LOL T
#14, SirVinny, May 4 1999 2:23AM
Broker Position Summary
#15, SirVinny, May 4 1999 11:19AM
Quick translation please. Is this supposed to mean something? TIA Lola:)
#16, Lola, May 4 1999 11:21AM
Yorkton went from holding -24,121 shares on April 1st to holding 514,187 shar
#17, SirVinny, May 4 1999 11:34AM
Options expiry: Somebody should take a look at the options that expired or abo
#18, New Economy, May 4 1999 11:36AM
Can anyone tell us if Yorkton were dumping shares in small increments yesterda
#19, nokomis, May 5 1999 7:33AM
yorkton is doing the same thing with IWM but they got cought that Paven guy d
#20, Paul Dhaliwal, May 5 1999 8:29PM
Lawyer named Halebian is considering a class action with regards to BII's unti
#21, SirVinny, May 6 1999 12:17AM
As requested, from Stockhouse Bulletin Board:
#22, SirVinny, May 6 1999 1:10AM
Guilty as h-ll!
#23, wpckr, May 6 1999 2:05PM
Keep up the great work SirVinny. Lola:))
#24, Lola, May 6 1999 7:58PM
Vince, I've been rather busy lately with some other things...good job you're d
#25, F. Evans, May 6 1999 10:38PM
To all, It is unfortunately that this type of behaviour on the part of York
#26, c.r. earle, May 7 1999 6:36PM
Guilty JD
#27, IEarnedIt, May 7 1999 6:39PM
c.r. earle, It is precisely because of the apathy that you describe that in
#28, SirVinny, May 8 1999 12:50AM
I agree totally
#29, c.r. earle, May 8 1999 8:07PM
This document was filed in Vancouver, B.C., on April 27, 1993.
#30, SirVinny, May 8 1999 9:40PM
Page 11
#31, SirVinny, May 8 1999 9:41PM
Page 21
#32, SirVinny, May 8 1999 9:46PM
The preceding post is dedicated to a large number of Canadian Business journal
#33, SirVinny, May 9 1999 5:07AM
Very interesting read SirVinny keep up the good work.
#34, John Freeman, May 9 1999 9:18AM
Great research sir vinney....I think an investigation is warranted based on th
#35, Wealthy1, May 11 1999 2:04AM
Mark Pavan's credentials as a stock analyst
#36, SirVinny, May 11 1999 5:54PM
This message was taken off of the RB board:
#37, RG, May 11 1999 6:13PM
<Yorkton, do you care about your credibility ?????> SirVinny you're so fun
#38, Lola, May 12 1999 2:47AM
Does anyone have the 800 phone # for the S E C please?
#39, regine, May 13 1999 11:19AM
sec.gov
#40, Jimmy Austen, May 13 1999 11:53AM
Thanks Jimmy!
#41, regine, May 13 1999 1:17PM
#42, Philip Geiger, May 13 1999 7:20PM
Thanks for the link, Jimmy:
#43, SirVinny, May 14 1999 12:21AM
Rumor has it that Yorkton was peeved at losing BIDS' future underwriting busin
#44, SirVinny, May 14 1999 12:38AM
Guilty!!! Hope something is done about it
#45, Musquaro, May 20 1999 12:02PM
View SubjectMarks
Bookmark this Subject
Return to Coffee Shop
Discussion | People | MetaCrawler
Subject Titles Only
Full-Text
This Subject Only
Send questions and feedback to webmistress@techstocks.com
Terms of Use
|
