Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zia Sun(zsun) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (2303)	6/3/1999 11:44:00 AM
From: who cares?	Respond to of 10354

I expect EPS of 65 cents in 1999 and a price of $30.00+ on a PE of 100. Again, how can you make any claims about P/E when ZSUN's biggest expense item of the year, it's acquisition price of OIA, has not been disclosed? Do you have any independent source to back up your numbers or are you strictly basing them on a couple of lines out of a ZSUN press release? That would seemingly be a risky proposition since they have a history of at best, strreeeettchhinnnngggg the truth in their PR's. I expect EPS of 65 cents in 1999 and a price of $30.00+ on a PE of 100. Considering that over 95% of ZSUN's profit last year came from selling stock, and the remainder of the profit likely came from it's printing operation in Manila, where do you justify a 100 p/e? When the first Quarter figures are released at the end of June First i'll make the rather bold assumption that your talking about June 1999. Is there some reason it takes them three months to get first quarter numbers together? CMGI reports earnings approximately 5 weeks after it's end of quarter, yet it takes BB to bowling ball in size comparison, ZSUN 12 weeks? Why was it that in the PR that hyped OIA's record first quarter there was no profit number given? They hyped record revenue, not profit. The only mention of profit was a completely unsubstantiated claim of profit for the whole year of 1999. Maybe the biggest question of all, why do you not hold ZSUN management to the same standards as "bashers" on this board. A "basher" can post a link to a Harvard Law School case summary and you call it alleged, yet you treat a PR from ZSUN, whose known to play fast and loose with the truth, like it's written in stone. Mr. Burns