SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bob Lao-Tse who wrote (51565)6/3/1999 4:29:00 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
I tired of posts on the prayer issue, so sue me. I took up a fresh issue, in the hopes of getting somewhere. I baited no trap, and the fact that you think I did is, well, pretty silly...Anyway, I was not proving the existence of God, but showing that reasonable arguments could be made based upon current scientific theories. I think that they are likely enough, but not clinchers, and was amused to see that you would not even concede that they had some validity. It was not very consistent with a claim of suspended belief...Shameful. I go out of my way to defend your position to Johannes; you say something that totally belies your profession of "suspended judgment"; I ejaculate a response; and now you accuse me of setting you up to embarrass you. Shameful. Hmmmmm....If one is sincerely perplexed, I respect that, as I said in my dialogue with Johannes. What more do you want?



To: Bob Lao-Tse who wrote (51565)6/3/1999 5:09:00 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
By the way, I do not know why you think that those who have faith would care about agnosticism. In fact, the two things are perfectly compatible, for we are at liberty to believe what we choose about things that we cannot obtain certain knowledge about. Nor do I know why you would call agnosticism a "world view", when it should be a lack of a world view...But hey, whatever...