To: Charliss who wrote (48439 ) 6/3/1999 11:14:00 PM From: stan s. Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90042
This thread can easily survive. If anyone here is or has been dependant on any one or two people, it's time to learn how to make this work on your own, or go under. No offense to Tim but the JACO incident was startling by virtue of the trust. People bought without any confirmation from any source! Frankly it was very disconcerting to watch from the periphery. Anyway, Tim announced his intentions to leave some time ago, so these changes come as no surprise even if the catalyst came from a surprising direction. The fact that this thread temporarily leaves one and all with a bitter taste is of no real consequence in the long run. It's bruised but it ain't dead...yet. All that need happen is for the core group...including but not limited to Charliss, Jeff, Jack, HandsOn, Kathy, Samuel etc. to organize a bit, find a direction and go with it. Perhaps a new set of rules should be inserted in the box at the top of the page. Or a new thread with the same participants...and a simple rejoinder that everyone will ignore anyone who ignores thread decorum and basic rules. This could be the best thread on SI... needs to get organized. Ignore the noise, pay no heed to it's source because anyone who disrupts...does it at the expense of all, for selfish purposes. By the way Charliss, SERO popped up on a volume, price scan, looks interesting to me as well. Kathy!!...it's another example of a bollinger squeeze...possible breakout. Hmmm, should I apologize for mentioning a stock? <g> Oh, Charliss this post was directed your way because of SERO. Sermon was not directed your way at all. Anyway, good luck to all, very much including Tim and Jane. Stan