SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FMK who wrote (11725)6/3/1999 9:06:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27311
 
Fred, when did I ever say Samsung is not or will not consider VLNC's battery? I simply pointed out that Wolanchuck's claim that the Wireless Week article said Samsung was using VLNC's battery was obviously another example of Wolanchuck hype. The article said nothing of the sort.

I understand why you feel the need to defend the guy though. If anybody has a worse record of VLNC predictions than you, it is Wolanchuck.



To: FMK who wrote (11725)6/3/1999 10:47:00 PM
From: MGV  Respond to of 27311
 
Why would Samsung even consider using Hanil's or Valence's batteries?

The better questions are why couldn't or wouldn't Samsung use VLNC's material through Hanil last year when they used li-poly batteries that were so clearly advanced over VLNC material that they were used in retail products and who is the, at minimum 1, company who was that far ahead?

Start hoping Samsung is looking for a 2nd or 3rd source there slick.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News