Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (61358)	6/3/1999 6:11:00 PM
From: re3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

<<<while Treasury rates decline in a flight to quality. er, Mike, is this deja vu all over again...i.e. the summer of 98 repeated...at least last summer we had Sammy Sosa to cheer... (I never liked McGwire)... IKE

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (61358)	6/4/1999 7:35:00 AM
From: valueminded	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 132070

Mike: tanks for the responce. I see your point, I viewed the increasing rates on treasuries and those less credit worthy as going hand in hand. Your view has them going separate ways. You mentioned <. A major NYC bank, and perhaps more than one, will stumble on derivatives trades.> Can you rank your candidates on this one ? On a different note - (maybe earlie has a read on this one) wouldnt you think that the attempt to force the (high end pc world) to accept a higher price dram (rambus) with royalties accruing (indirectly) to Intel (the monopoly player in the high end market) would be something the FTC would take notice of in its antimonopoly efforts. yes / no