SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LSI Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: shane forbes who wrote (18711)6/4/1999 2:25:00 AM
From: shane forbes  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25814
 
Ha Ha - I'm getting caught in the FUD. Make that 457/445 = '2.7% increase' not plain '2.7%'.



To: shane forbes who wrote (18711)6/4/1999 5:13:00 PM
From: M.  Respond to of 25814
 
Strut:

I do hope you'll continue on here. I suppose some lurkers thought the debate was a cat fight, but I certainly did not. I found myself making a beeline to the computer as soon as I'd gotten home from work. The thread has been absolutely hot. Then too, I found your methods for anticipating earnings fascinating. Please don't stop doing those exercises. You may be challenged, but your proofs seemed accurate enough to me.

As for the Other People's Money, that's just an excuse. I live in the State of Iowa and we have quite a bit of gambling here, especially where I live. The debate goes on that they should remove the credit card machines from the casinos because people run up huge gambling debts ruining their lives and the lives of their families. I'm sure it happens, but then fools and their money have always been easily parted. If someone is trying to lay blame on you for their poor investment, or, if you are carrying any guilt because someone has got themselves caught up in your enthusiasm, then you do yourself disservice. Markets and casinos always have winners and losers, and people with s**t for brains always find themselves the latter.

MFS