Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Johannes Pilch who wrote (51674)	6/4/1999 4:19:00 PM
From: Bob Lao-Tse	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Johannes: Well. First, I must apologize for my hasty response. Apparently you do have some support for your claim. I would simply state that when I referred to such things as "unanswerable," I meant currently unanswerable, not forever and ever until the end of time unanswerable. However, I can see why you interpreted this as you did and can only say that I should have been more specific then, that you might understand now. And for what I sincerely hope will be my last words on the subject: I really think that you should examine what it is that compels you, or what lack it is that allows you, to deny my claim to my own view. While I might (and have done so) stoop so low as to state that you are a hypocritical theist or an incomplete theist or an inconsistent theist or what-have-you, I would never think to say, "You are not a theist." The simple fact that you believe yourself to be such means that for all intents and purposes you are. I might think that you aren't very good at it, but that is simply my opinion. I would never blithely state, "No you're not." All I have sought is that same consideration from others. -BLT