Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Technical analysis for shorts & longs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Foad who wrote (21371)	6/4/1999 3:28:00 PM
From: Cape Blanco	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67915

Clint, you might want to keep your eye on ANCR. Its running with BRCD and the business it got with SUNW. Marc

To: Foad who wrote (21371)	6/4/1999 3:34:00 PM
From: Clint E.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67915

No idea, Foad. Must be news-driven.

To: Foad who wrote (21371)	6/4/1999 3:37:00 PM
From: IA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67915

Foad, I think it's this: DJ AT&T, Portland -2: Portland Ruling Likely to Be Appealed Symbol: AOL ATHM GTE T USW Industry: BRD CAB CBL CSV ENT HOU IAS LDS MED PUB RTL TEL TLS Government: FCC Subject: DJN DJWI NET UTI WEI Market Sector: CYC NCY UTI Geographic Region: CO CT NME NY OR US USE USS USW VA Product/Service: DCP DIT DLE DME DTE By Mark Wigfield WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--AT&T Corp. (T) has no right to exclude competing Internet Service Providers from its cable systems, a federal judge in Oregon has ruled in a case that could help shape the rules for competition in the lucrative market for high-speed Internet service. In a blow to the telecommunications giant, Judge Owen Panner upheld the to condition their approval of the merger between AT&T and the former Tele-Communications Inc. on an open access requirement. "The mandatory access condition does not substantially impair the plaintiff's contractual rights under the franchise agreements," the judge wrote. AT&T had successfully fought off efforts to impose such conditions on a national level during review of its merger by the Federal Communications Commission. "This probably signals a turning of the tide in this debate," said Scott Cleland, a telecommunications analyst with the Legg Mason Precursor Group. "It's a very significant legal decision. Now, the FCC has to decide if it wants to have open access imposed city by city, set national rules, or rescue AT&T from the cities." Cleland said federal pre-emption, however, would be unlikely. A number of other cities also want open cable access, including Seattle, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Oakland, Washington, D.C., and Miami. However, the judge's decision is likely to be appealed. Siding with the city of Portland were GTE Internetworking Inc., a unit of GTE Corp. (GTE); U.S. West Enterprise America; OGC Telecom Ltd.; and the Oregon Internet Service Provider Association. (MORE) DOW JONES NEWS 06-04-99