Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Graphs who wrote (10270)	6/4/1999 3:59:00 PM
From: Jacktoad	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 29970

well said. do ya think they'll check out the judge's recent trading activity<g>?

To: E. Graphs who wrote (10270)	6/4/1999 4:00:00 PM
From: Killian	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 29970

It ain't over 'til Armstrong sings!!!! And he will!!! Kevin

To: E. Graphs who wrote (10270)	6/4/1999 4:04:00 PM
From: bwtidal	Respond to of 29970

In 1997 Peter Huber wrote a book entitled "Law and Disorder in Cyberspace: Abolish the FCC and Let Common Law Rule the Telecosm". Is this what he had in mind??

To: E. Graphs who wrote (10270)	6/5/1999 10:41:00 AM
From: E. Graphs	Respond to of 29970

>>Anyway, AT&T doesn't have a monopoly on high-speed Internet access and the notion that it does -- as it's presented -- is silly. DSL will be available country-wide from many providers, as will satellite access. There are many ways to achieve high-speed Internet access. AT&T is pursuing the cable route. It owns the cable network. It paid for it. AT&T should be able to do with it what it wishes. Or, should the first satellite connection companies make their satellite services available to every competitor, too? America is a country of business based on capitalism, not socialism.<< fool.com