SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Naked Truth - Big Kahuna a Myth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (45161)6/4/1999 5:05:00 PM
From: BGR  Respond to of 86076
 
Can be is different from is. But let's agree to disagree here. :-)



To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (45161)6/4/1999 7:02:00 PM
From: NickSE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86076
 
HOW A LEAK AT TREASURY IS TIED TO THE JOBS REPORT
nypostonline.com

...Rates on 30-year government bonds - the ones that control mortgage and other borrowing costs - are close to 6 percent, a one-year high. And any large increase in job growth this morning will send the bond over the 6 percent level and probably doom it to a future at 6.5 percent or even 7 percent.

And if rates go much higher, the stock market and Bill Clinton's ratings could collapse.

President Clinton needs good job growth. But he can't afford the resulting higher rates which could hurt stocks.

That's how the leak that the government is planning to buy back bonds comes in. If Washington has the dough to repurchase billions in bonds, then rates will stay under control even if job growth takes off, inflation rises and even if Japanese investors start selling U.S. bonds...


Nick



To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (45161)6/4/1999 7:20:00 PM
From: James W. Riley  Respond to of 86076
 
Mohan, thanks for setting it straight. Amen



To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (45161)6/4/1999 7:28:00 PM
From: robnhood  Respond to of 86076
 
Mohan,, If the markets were logical, we would all be rich..

I always smile when I read that Tokyo was up because of blah blah, or Intel was down because of blah blah---
If Tokyo or Intel had gone the other way then they would have just reversed what they said....maybe tossed in a more futuristic reason for flavour... No?