Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sergio H who wrote (2067)	6/4/1999 6:08:00 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 19428

The rules were it had to be in a short time, originally five, later eight trading days (though I understand they've been considering removing the time frame). That's been the notion of those on the bearish side ever since Internet mania began, that it would inevitably end with one colossal bang. Don't ask me why, I wasn't around for that Dutch tulip thingy they keep bringing up.

To: Sergio H who wrote (2067)	6/4/1999 9:28:00 PM
From: Mad2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 19428

40-60% on stocks that are overvalued by 400-600%. I think we are in a downtrend. We'll see rally's but they won't break resistance and will make new lows down the road. Eventually stocks must support their market value according to fundamental methods of analysis as compared to the dreamy pot of gold senario's envisioned by enthusiast's of the Nut's. Volatility favors professional traders. Exuberant values were certianly interesting, but gone. Mad2

To: Sergio H who wrote (2067)	6/5/1999 6:08:00 PM
From: David Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19428

IFLY closed on an 8 month low on Friday....you loved the stock in the mid-teens, must mean you're ready to marry it at $4.43. How's that long doing? If I recall correctly, you attributed Auric's short call on IFLY to "luck." To what do you attribute YOUR call? Extreme misfortune? It's interesting that you've jumped off the mini-momo bandwagon and onto the "research" train; would you characterize your call on IFLY as research or mini-momo driven? If the former, why did your "research" not manifest itself in the stock price, during an incredible bull market for internet stocks? Why did you characterize the real and meaningful research--especially Auric's, which addressed the warrant and management character issues--"luck?" Small Cap Forum gig not going well, eh? ROFLMAO