SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Marco Polo who wrote (60625)6/4/1999 8:58:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Respond to of 1572807
 
<Anyhoo, they did not scrap their 25% promise.>

I don't feel like digging up the article, but I remember it was on CNet, where an AMD marketing representative said that AMD is no longer going to stick to their 25% discount plan. Instead, they said they were going to price their chips so that the overall system would cost less than a comparable Intel-based system. I posted it a few times last year.

<The K6-2 still today sells at 25% less than a Pentium II, as does a K6-III to a PIII.>

Not even AMD compares the K6-2 to a Pentium II anymore. And although AMD will still try and position the K6-III against the Pentium III, the low low price of the K6-III, coupled with the low volumes, tells me that it's not doing too well when compared to the high volume, high priced Pentium III.

It's my opinion that in reality, K6-2 is positioned against Celeron, K6-III somewhere between Pentium II and Celeron, and K7 against Pentium III. Willamette is too far out there (technology-wise as well as release date) to be pitted against the K7. But then again, it all depends on your definition of "seventh-generation technology."

Tenchusatsu