SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Harmond who wrote (60697)6/5/1999 1:53:00 AM
From: KeepItSimple  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
William, maybe I'm missing something but that message didn't make a lot of sense..

Are you suggesting Barron's authors tried to knock it down in order to buy shares cheaply? I really have no clue as to what the central argument you were trying to make.

>got the most overowned most expensive bubble mania frenzy stock

Huh? Have you been drinking? You're practically admitting Amazon's stock is a ponzi scheme. I thought you tried to convince everyone that the price was based at least in part on their "limitless potential" ??

I really am confused.



To: Bill Harmond who wrote (60697)6/5/1999 2:12:00 AM
From: Mark Fowler  Respond to of 164684
 
Looks like Amazon did what Yahoo did: it came down and touched its 200 SMA.
I wonder if Barron's will tout the fact that they got the most overowned most
expensive bubble mania frenzy stock since the West India Company "crash" by
9% by running a cover story that articulated how it was overvalued by 500%?
looks like Amazon did what Yahoo did: it came down and touched its 200 SMA.<<

;-)
After the recent drop in Internet Stock prices, do you think they are: [471 votes total]

vote.pollit.com



To: Bill Harmond who wrote (60697)6/5/1999 8:46:00 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 

How can I not question it when two dozen of you are chanting at us handful of bulls? I
get "rogated" here constantly.


William,

Did you not just call me a cementhead? I had huge financial losses last year and people beating me up daily on this thread last year but did not resort to name calling except for one person the name of which I have forgotten. I should feel sorry for you? Give me a break.

Glenn



To: Bill Harmond who wrote (60697)6/5/1999 3:33:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
William in a prior post you said you thought the correction was over - were you kidding or do you really think that and if so, why? I was thinking more choppyness ahead.