SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Berk who wrote (60639)6/5/1999 10:35:00 AM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572099
 
RE:"The investment community will never sell (until
its too late?) Intel because of its dominance in its market. AMD will
outperform Intel only if you are willing to trade it and trade it correctly
since the buy must be followed by a sell as well as possibly a short sell."...

Words of wisdom if I've ever heard any.

Jim



To: Berk who wrote (60639)6/5/1999 10:49:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 1572099
 
Dick - Re: "Few would be willing to bet that "this time it's different" not when the stock has such violent swings. Disclosure: I have owned AMD in the past since I believe in the validity of the story but haven't made much from it although you have got me interested again! "

Ah...but this time, it IS DIFFERENT.

Maybe.

Maybe not !

Paul



To: Berk who wrote (60639)6/6/1999 12:11:00 PM
From: A. A. LaFountain III  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572099
 
Dick: re <the normal "cycle" of core portfolio holdings versus "non-core ">

You're right. Of course, the question arises whether a holding should be taken as "core" when it is identified as one (by the time it reaches that exalted position, it's probably well through that life stage). The great one-decision stocks of the 1970s were thusly anointed (Polaroid, Avon, Xerox, et al) close to the time that they became toxic investments.

Thus the great irony of rule-based investing - it works right up until the time it doesn't. Fortunate for all of us, since we would otherwise be replaced by programs. - Tad LaFountain