Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : LifeOne, Inc. (LONE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: paper man who wrote (1145)	6/5/1999 10:59:00 AM
From: paper man	Respond to of 1834

Since no body asked, let me giv emy opinion of the trading the other day. The sheep story from the news letter doesnot fit this one. An entity bought half million shares in 7 minutes. when anyone wanting sell got wind and placed some orders, it fell back. It was going to fall back anyway....... ( buy pressure compltete) The MMs went back to half price of the buy and printed bis side trades in thye forties at double the volume needed to cover the singles at the .80s ( 2x4 = 8 ) Or they went to the wharehouse in the forties, for everything they sold in the .80. the wake job in effect afterwards allows them to continue and consolidate, covering the .80, flushing the .20s; but building out a base of .40s for future selling past .80. I would anticpate a dry line movemnet past .60 once the activity cools. I do not buy the newsletter deal as there must be one hell of alot of buttheads that get soaked. If it was, no problem. The fall back has zilch to do with the company and the company and its long term shareholders could care less for all the new crap since the newsletter..... THE NEWS LETTER DID NOT MAKE US AND IS NOT PART OF US. is the glass half empty or half full..... good lcuk ps. I have never subscribed to a hump and dump letter, never will; and certainly i do not invest in shell BBs nor advocate support for them. This company is a real and dynamic as the stimated 1.5 million shares that the participants on this thread are long, and CALLING.

To: paper man who wrote (1145)	6/5/1999 11:31:00 AM
From: makin_dough99	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1834

paperman - Yes, I would love being in this stock if a court order to cover was issued, and Yes I would love a smaller float due to less certs laying in around in various broker's accounts - unless there was a non-hypothecation letter in those accounts (preventing the broker from lending stock to others). I have no clue at all regarding the 50k below the bid. Also, since I just came to this thread I had no knowledge of all the things (Canadian shorting and late filings, etc. going on, as I said previously, and was only reporting about others who tried calling certs in other heavily shorted stocks. Nice meeting you and I wish you, and all the longs here, all the best.