To: marketbrief.com who wrote (6881 ) 6/5/1999 10:42:00 PM From: ecommerceman Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13953
Marketbrief--If you're *simply* interested in trying to "get an idea what recent buyers are thinking," then all you need do is ask. If, on the other hand, you want to state that the analysts who have recommended E*Trade are "third-tier shills"--which they clearly are not--and imply that E*Trade somehow mysteriously persuaded them to recommend its stock--which is patently ridiculous on the face of it--then you're not going to get a very friendly reception, nor should you expect one. As I said earlier, there is no reason that shorts shouldn't be welcome here--if you're an honest short and want to get into a conversation about EGRP, I'd love to have one with you. Both of us might learn something. We've had good exchanges on this thread between shorts and/or skeptics in the past, and I hope we have them in the future. However, slammers who make ridiculous posts are not going to be welcomed by most of the folks here, pure and simple. Your second to last sentence illustrates my point: I *have* been amused by the flurry of bullish "news," upgrades, reiterations, and earnings revisions while EGRP has lost a third of its price in the last few weeks. You put news in quotes, implying that the releases that E*Trade has made are not news. Excuse me, buying Telbank isn't news enough for you, it's "news?" What is amusing about the fact that E*Trade has been upgraded by numerous analysts? Care to explain? I didn't think so. "Reiterations?" What do you mean by that? "Earnings revisions?" What are you talking about? Let's face facts, Marketbrief, you're a slammer, pure and simple. If you want to make the case against E*Trade, then make it. This factless innuendo bullshit of yours is ridiculous.