SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : America On-Line (AOL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tom Tallant who wrote (20505)6/5/1999 7:15:00 PM
From: David Petty  Respond to of 41369
 
Tom ,it has been a tough month. Can you imagine what the banter on this thread would have been like (if any banter at all) if there had been no popup late Friday...

Another vote for no rate hike / another view on the May jobs figure- this from the Washington Post (They can not sue me... I have diplomatic immunity):

Unemployment Rate Falls - Take Number 7

By George Hager
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, June 5, 1999; Page E01

The nation's unemployment rate fell back to 4.2 percent in May, its lowest
level in 29 years, but job growth almost came to a standstill, the
government reported yesterday.

The decline in the jobless rate from 4.3 percent in April suggested the
economy is continuing to race along. But other parts of the Labor
Department report appeared to support those who believe the economy is
slowing. Most startling was the finding that the economy had generated
only 11,000 jobs instead of 200,000 or more that economists were
expecting.

With the Federal Reserve Board mulling an interest rate increase as soon
as the end of this month, economists and financial markets had been
looking nervously to the unemployment figures for a clue as to whether the
economy is so hot that it could touch off a bout of inflation and provoke
the Fed to tighten interest rates to head it off.

But the numbers appeared to settle nothing. The slight decline in the
unemployment rate while few jobs were created could be explained by a
small number of people leaving the work force.

"It's clearly a mixed bag," said Steve Slifer, chief U.S. economist for
Lehman Brothers. "I'm not sure the employment data themselves were
terribly enlightening."

Katharine G. Abraham, commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics,
called the figures a "wait-and-see report," and said she would need
another two months of data before discerning any trend.

The financial markets were similarly ambivalent. Initially, bond prices fell
sharply but later rallied and finished the day slightly lower, with the yield
on the benchmark 30-year Treasury reaching 5.96 percent. The stock
market shrugged off the news, trading with no seeming direction
throughout the day before the Dow Jones industrial average surged in late
trading to finish up 136.15 points, at 10,799.84, for a gain of 1.3 percent.

The 4.2 percent unemployment rate matched the March jobless rate,
which was the lowest since February 1970.

For some economists, the strong unemployment rate was further evidence
that the job market is extremely tight, the sign of a super-hot economy that
could push wages up and raise inflation, which has recently been running
at a moderate rate of about 2.25 percent.

"There really aren't any more bodies to hire," said Sun Won Sohn, chief
economic officer for Wells Fargo. "Some of our customers are telling us
that labor is virtually impossible to get . . . this is another nail in the coffin
for tightening interest rates."

But others noted that if the job market really was that tight, wages would
be accelerating as employers bid up salaries to attract increasingly scarce
workers.

In fact, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said that the average hourly wage
rose 0.4 percent in May, more than forecast. But Ray Stone, an
economist with Stone & McCarthy Research Associates, called that
number "very benign," insisting it would be "wrong to conclude that wage
pressures have intensified in May."

Slifer of Lehman Brothers noted that on an annual basis, May wages rose
at a modest 3.6 percent rate, substantially lower than the 4.4 percent rate
when wage acceleration peaked in April of last year.

Taken together, Slifer said, the Bureau of Labor Statistics data "suggest
that the economy is slowing a bit." As for the Fed, he said, "I'm not
looking for them to raise rates at the end of the month."

"It certainly does give the Fed some breathing room," agreed Ken
Goldstein, an economist with the Conference Board in New York. But
while "it lessens the chance that the Fed's going to move in June," he said,
"I doubt seriously if it disrupts their long-term strategy" to raise rates.
Goldstein said he expects an increase by Labor Day.

The Federal Reserve Board's policymaking committee will meet for two
days beginning June 29 to assess rates; it already has signaled that it is
sufficiently worried about inflation to adopt a bias toward ratcheting up
rates.

Economists and market strategists have been watching for any indicator
that would push the Fed one way or the other, and with yesterday's report
inconclusive, their focus will shift to the release of the May produce price
index on June 11 and the consumer price index on June 16. It was an
unexpected 0.7 percent jump in the CPI for April that sparked concerns
in the financial markets that the Fed would have to raise rates to head off
inflation.

Economists who sought to explain the sharp drop-off in new jobs in May
noted that the April number had been revised upward almost as sharply,
from 234,000 to 343,000 new jobs.

"Given everything else we know that's going on in the economy, [the May
figure] may be revised upward" as well, said Peter Kretzmer, senior
economist with Bank of America Corp.

Some of the May drop-off could also reflect one-time anomalies in hiring
patterns and government scorekeeping. For example, while construction
jobs rose a strong 200,000 during the month, that was recorded as a
40,000-job drop below the seasonally-adjusted expectation for May,
when construction hiring usually picks up. Several economists noted that
mild weather prevented many of the usual winter layoffs, which meant that
many of the workers who would usually be rehired in May were already
working.

Other sectors shed jobs in May: manufacturing continued a downward
slide, losing 45,000 jobs; mining lost 7,000 jobs, largely attributed to the
slowdown in oil and gas drilling. The usually booming service sector
turned sluggish in May, adding 71,000 new jobs instead of the 125,000
jobs it has averaged over the last 12 months.

Other pieces of the data pointed to a steadily tightening job market. Black
unemployment dropped to 7.5 percent, the lowest rate since separate
statistics were first collected in 1973, according to the Labor Department.
Teenage unemployment fell to 12.6 percent, and the unemployment rate
for adult women fell to 3.6 percent, both the lowest in 30 years.

"What it suggests to me is that this is an economy that is finally lifting all
boats," Labor Secretary Alexis Herman said. "We are finally tapping all
labor pools."



To: Tom Tallant who wrote (20505)6/6/1999 11:03:00 AM
From: Tom Tallant  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 41369
 
For those interested...Here is a copy of the City of Portland's Post-Argument brief concerning open access:

mhcrc.org

Tom