Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Manhattan Scientific....MHTX -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Bishop who wrote (412)	6/5/1999 9:27:00 PM
From: jbIII	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 942

if you look at a level II you would probably see total volume as 2.6MM. - I don't know otherwise but I've always assumed it went the other way. Investor A sells X shares to MM who sells X shares to Investor B. X shares actually traded from A to B but Volume recorded is 2X. So for 1.3M shares Friday, only 650K actually traded hands. BWDIK I could be mistaken. In any case , even with the added volume and the positve interest you still have Maslow.

To: Jim Bishop who wrote (412)	6/6/1999 3:07:00 PM
From: John Finley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 942

Hi Jim Re:>>Other than insider trading, I'm not sure why you would care<< It'd be good to know if the sales were from small retail or some heavy hitters. A histogram of trade sizes on buy and sell would be nice but the heavy hitters could just break up the sales to throw that off. Maslow has been accused of sucking the blood out of good stories by some on the PJTV thread. I have no idea if this is true but since MHTX isn't reporting yet, I'm wary. The reason I'm here is that I find the technology fascinating. If Hockaday can pull this off it'll be a blockbuster. Unfortunately good stories attract both butterflies and mosquitoes <g>. Anyway, thanks for the links, Jim. BTW is MYNG back on the BB? I've stopped reading the board after the sabres were drawn. JF