Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (10556)	6/5/1999 9:19:00 PM
From: Benkea	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 29970

Not sure we all aren't over assuming T's commitment to us: Some sources close to the Kleiner Perkins camp describe Hindrey as hard to deal with, and there is apparently no love lost between Hindrey and AtHome's Jermoluk. Hindrey stated flatly at a conference last month that AT&T doesn't want to be in the content business and doesn't want customers to be locked into AtHome content offerings – a position that doesn't marry well with AtHome's acquisition of Excite. Hindrey's stance has upset Jermoluk. So while an AOL-AT&T deal may make financial sense, it may not make as much personal sense. Says one source: thestandard.com

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (10556)	6/6/1999 11:25:00 AM
From: Boplicity	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 29970

Frank, I would like to know the practical Limit on channels (500 is what I remember being said) how are they divided up or how is the cable's bandwidth divided in a FDMA scheme. Is it practical to let other ISP on cable with out diminishing the usefulness of it in broadband sense? For example, currently I have two modems installed in my computer, and use two ISP or direct dial-up to ETrade at the same time, (shhh don't tell anyone I have no delays with ETrade.) <ggg> What happens if I have cable and I want two ISP at the same time and make a phone call? If it's no big deal in a technical sense to sell the available bandwidth, then I can see no technical reason for T or anyone else to not let other use there line at a reasonable rate. The problem then becomes what is a reasonable rate and where the ISP can connect into the cable system? A white paper would be good, or site where I could do the digging would be fine. If my thinking is correct the headend could be considered the CO (center office of the cable world) so the AOL's or the world would have to be given space to attach there or at the bone. Is that correct? With T going to a 50 home topology, making the ISP connect there way too costly so at the bone would be the way to go. But why should T be forced to sell space on it's bone when the Qwest of the world are free to use the free market system to sell there bandwidth? Greg