Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lml who wrote (4044)	6/5/1999 9:47:00 PM
From: Mark Madden	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12823

Thank you for the thorough explanation. I gather the issue is far from dead and T will have a tough time making business decisions until the issue is resolved.

To: lml who wrote (4044)	6/5/1999 10:35:00 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12823

lml - Thank you for a carefully reasoned post. In further consideration of this issue, I think ATT should issue a statement about their plans. They should do this quickly because of the possible negative impact on their stock and the bonds they have recently issued. If they were to issue a statement that they intend to proceed on a national level as originally planned without regard to the outcome of the decision in the Portland Case, any negative impact on the stock and bonds could be averted. However, if they remain silent, their is uncertainty created by the decision and that uncertainty could have a negative impact. I should add that I do own some Antec stock and the price of those shares could be adversely impacted by this decision. Ken

To: lml who wrote (4044)	6/5/1999 10:46:00 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 12823

lml, I enjoyed your reporting on this matter, but I get the sense that I/we was/were not privy to all that you have read on the topic. Would you mind posting the urls that you found most substantive, if you deem them to be out of the ordinary [the ones we've all seen here], if it's not a great bother? While I'm not sure I agree with you on everything you stated, your post was very well thought out, and at the same time, provocative. Thanks. Regards, Frank Coluccio