Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: russet who wrote (19827)	6/6/1999 11:50:00 AM
From: EIGHT-N	Respond to of 26850

y'know, in the contorted world of high spec. investing one gets all kinds of crazed paranoic ideas. in fact, i think(and what do i know) wsp is merely trying to fulfill an obligation of proving up the resource as conservatively possible. keeps everyone unhappy at the same time precluding a fly out with a home run swing(on a obvious low and outside slider.) hey anyone happy to see me back.

To: russet who wrote (19827)	6/7/1999 9:27:00 AM
From: mineman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

Last October I asked why they did not collar large diameter holes at the same angle as the dyke in order to get 30 to 60 metre long core samples for a mini-bulk sample and they told me the drillers could not drill holes at shallow angles. Today I asked a driller who said this would be very easy as there were no major faults where they could lose circulation. Why didn't top management order this mini-bulk procedure to test a number of different areas of the property? It is more evidence that top management know the core was salted and contains no large top-quality diamonds at all! Does anyone know of another reason this sampling procedure was not used?