Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : InfoSpace (INSP): Where GNET went! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Zenith who wrote (6839)	6/6/1999 10:13:00 AM
From: option007	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28311

I HAVE NO POSITIONS IN GNET My opinion is not biased one way or the other as I have no positions. Answer me these questions: - when price went to $199 why did managment not want higher price. - when price is at mid ninetes, why does Allan not increase position - why does Russell say Allan is smart to only pay $90 for Gnet - why if price is cheap is volume so low as not to attract buyers. - why does Gnet not follow leads like Yhoo and Aol; big jumps. - why is no one buying with Paine Webber conference and stock split. - why are IPO's faltering. - A stock that loses $100 should come back fast. Why not Gnet? - Reports say viewers on Internets are decreasing. - Stock ticker indicated on Friday no big purchases. - Barrons says people are so brainwashed on internets they buy no reason just like biotech stocks. - briefing recommends only to buy stocks that have held well in correction. $100 loss is hardly doing well. - there is a huge lot of sellers who own thousands of shares and are a liability to Gnet. These are people who bought at $70, $60 etc. They are extremely nervous. Judge for yourself. Just my views.