Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MikeM54321 who wrote (4059)	6/6/1999 5:09:00 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12823

Mike, All, A photostat copy of the court's opinion which I think you'd be interested in, courtesy of Franz Ross on the ATHM Thread. Message 9997666

To: MikeM54321 who wrote (4059)	6/6/1999 6:14:00 PM
From: Rande Is	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 12823

Incumbents (ILECs) won't deploy five year old DSL technology either. And for the exact same reasons AT&T might NOW pull out of Portland. As I said, consumers generally don't understand the legal battles and apparently a city commissioner, in his mis-guided glee, doesn't either. This is a big bucks game and so far, Armstrong is the only big player to step up to the plate with the resources to change the landscape. It is a pleasure to see that there are those that are seeing the bigger picture here. I have said many times that AT&T will wind up making more money off the internet than any other company by the year 2003. This Oregon ruling is just a bump in the road for them, in my opinion. Rande Is