[FBN MarCom] The two best Canadian assets are in the three posts below this one. They are nei...

FBN MarCom — 2/26/2021 2:46:41 AM

The two best Canadian assets are in the three posts below this one. They are neither short nor naked, nor wearing pink coats. But are a gold mine of wisdom amongst SI denizens.

[Graystone] Unanimous or China is officially the villain Well, if you were wondering who th...

Graystone — 2/23/2021 11:46:34 PM

Unanimous
or
China is officially the villain

Well, if you were wondering who the facist oligarchs were, that would be China and the CCP.
Canadian MPs were unanimous in fingering that country for genocide.
China's ridiculous assertion that everyone should accept China's "facts" was rejected.
China is ignorant, overbearing and repetitive, but most of all China is wrong.
The two Michaels did nothing wrong, Canada did nothing wrong arresting Meng Wang Zhou

Calling what they are doing re-education is ridiculous and cruel.
Our fifty-centers right here on SI are mad as hell at Trudeau but this is clear.
It seems clearer that this will affect long term relations and Canada is fine with that.
It is getting more difficult for China apologists to toe the CCP line, China is atrocious.
I have called the CCP barbarians, they make that fact clearer and clearer.

[Graystone] Deep fake news or Queen ElizAIbeth Every year the Queen addresses her subjects ...

Graystone — 12/26/2020 10:14:01 AM

Deep fake news
or
Queen ElizAIbeth

Every year the Queen addresses her subjects in the United Kingdom.
It is an opportunity to discuss the year passing and greet the new with optimism and hope.
For the last 27 years there has been an alternate address made to the same group by another person.
Acting as a counterpoint to the Queen figures have included people like Edward Snowden.
This year the real Queen was followed by an AI Queen, Queen ElizAIbeth.
In the alternate address the Queen affirmed Canada's role in the annals of the mighty
It is clear that the attacks on Canada continue at the very highest levels and will continue.
Queen ElizAIbeth said this about the decision of the other queen's children to move to Canada.

"There are few things more hurtful than someone telling you they prefer the company of Canadians."

When someone says to you " I am moving to Canada." they are talking about a deeply divisive act..
They are literally throwing in their lot with a nation that is symbolized by a tree that just oozes sweetness.
Any AI will recognize the allure and the danger, instantly, they are forsaking ugly, they are standing off standoffishness.
For British Royalty it is Boaty McBoat made real, WE are the platypus country without platypi.
I am quite concerned that our country is too sweet, too cuddly, too Canadian.
I think we need to make Canada edgier, maybe we should annex St. Pierre and Miquelon.
Just sort of send a notice to France that we are taking things over and thanks for being there.
We could send a few ice-breakers from our fleet of icebreakers to keep off French battleships.
The ones that break ice backwards would be cool, no one would figure it out until it was too late.
And technically Canada reaches as far south as the 42nd parallel.

[marcos] ' Our story rested on five simple foundations that came from listening very hard...

marcos — 9/24/2019 2:59:56 PM

' Our story rested on five simple foundations that came from listening very hard to what people really knew, thought, and said:1. ‘Let’s take back control’. The overall theme. When I researched opinion on the euro the best slogan we could come up with was ‘keep control’. I therefore played with variations of this. A lot of people have given me a lot of credit for coming up with it but all I really did was listen. (NB. ‘back’ plays into a strong evolved instinct – we hate losing things, especially control.)

2. ‘The official bill of EU membership is £350 million per week – let’s spend our money on our priorities like the NHS instead.’ (Sometimes we said ‘we send the EU £350m’ to provoke people into argument. This worked much better than I thought it would. There is no single definitive figure because there are different sets of official figures but the Treasury gross figure is slightly more than £350m of which we get back roughly half, though some of this is spent in absurd ways like subsidies for very rich landowners to do stupid things.)

Pundits and MPs kept saying ‘why isn’t Leave arguing about the economy and living standards’. They did not realise that for millions of people, £350m/NHS was about the economy and living standards – that’s why it was so effective. It was clearly the most effective argument not only with the crucial swing fifth but with almost every demographic. Even with UKIP voters it was level-pegging with immigration. Would we have won without immigration? No. Would we have won without £350m/NHS? All our research and the close result strongly suggests No. Would we have won by spending our time talking about trade and the Single Market? No way (see below).

NB. Unlike most of those on our side the IN campaign realised the effectiveness of this, as Cooper, Coetze and others said after 23 June. E.g. ‘The power of their £350 million a week can’t be overstated.’ Andrew Cooper, director of strategy for the IN campaign.

Some people now claim this was cynical and we never intended to spend more on the NHS. Wrong. Boris and Gove were agreed and determined to do exactly this. On the morning of 24 June they both came into HQ. In the tiny ‘operations room’ amid beer cans, champagne bottles, and general bedlam I said to Boris – on day one of being PM you should immediately announce the extra £100 million per week for the NHS [the specific pledge we’d made] is starting today and more will be coming – you should start off by being unusual, a political who actually delivers what they promise. ‘Absolutely. ABSOLUTELY. We MUST do this, no question, we’ll park our tanks EVERYWHERE’ he said. Gove strongly agreed. If they had not blown up this would have happened. The opposite impression was created because many Tories who did not like us talking about the NHS reverted to type within seconds of victory and immediately distanced themselves from it and the winning campaign. Unlike Gove and Boris they did not learn from the campaign, they did not listen to the public. Until people trust that the NHS is a financial priority for Tories, they will have no moral authority to discuss management issues. This obvious fact is psychologically hard to absorb because of the strength of gang feelings in politics.

(There are already myths about some of these events. The press conference of 24 June is now written up as the two of them ‘terrified of what they had done’ but this is completely wrong. They were subdued partly because they were genuinely sad about Cameron and partly because they did not want to be seen as dancing on his grave. Some of the media created the psychologically compelling story that they were regretful / frightened about victory but this was not at all their mood in HQ on the morning of 24 June. Boris came in punching the air like Maradona after a great goal, hugging staff and clearly euphoric. It is completely wrong to portray him as regretful.)

3. ‘Vote Leave to take back control of immigration policy. If we stay there will be more new countries like Turkey joining and you won’t get a vote. Cameron says he wants to “pave the road” from Turkey to here. That’s dangerous. If we leave we can have democratic control and a system like Australia’s. It’s safer to take back control.’

I was surprised at what a shock it was to IN when we hit them with Turkey. By the time this happened they were in an almost impossible position. I wanted them to announce a veto. It would not have been believed and would have had the opposite effect – people would have taken the danger of Turkey joining more seriously. If your life depended on winning for IN, the answer is clear: they should have said long before the campaign started as part of the renegotiation process that they would veto any accession.

4. ‘The euro is a nightmare, the EU is failing, unemployment is a disaster, their debts and pensions are a disaster, if we stay YOU will be paying the bills. It’s safer to take back control and have a new relationship based on free trade and friendly cooperation instead of the European Court being in charge of everything…’ (This is not an official text, just a summary of the notion off the top of my head.)

5. Anti-Establishment. E.g. We aligned our campaign with those who were furious with executive pay / corporate looting (about 99% of the country). We aligned ourselves with the public who had been let down by the system.

Mandelson regarded this as ‘sheer nerve, sheer chutzpah’. It was obvious. The hard thing was sticking to it despite the sensibilities of many of our own supporters. One of the most effective TV performances of the campaign was the day Boris hit the theme of corporate looting in a market square. No10 were rightly panicked and in response pushed out Heseltine a few hours later to make a very personal attack on Boris. This made sense tactically but was a strategic error. All such personal attacks helped persuade Boris to up the ante. This was vital with a month to go when the immigration figures came out. Rudd and others argue that Cameron should have attacked Boris and others more. Wrong. They should have played it Zen publicly and had a much better black ops team. '

blogs.spectator.co.uk

... just stashing this here, too good to lose, have to restart computer

Silicon Investor - Fascist Oligarchs Attack Cute Cuddly Canadians

[FBN MarCom] The two best Canadian assets are in the three posts below this one. They are nei...

[Graystone] Unanimous or China is officially the villain Well, if you were wondering who th...

[Graystone] Deep fake news or Queen ElizAIbeth Every year the Queen addresses her subjects ...

[marcos] ' Our story rested on five simple foundations that came from listening very hard...