SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
CNXT the moderated thread
An SI Board Since August 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
150 30 0 CNXT
Emcee:  Bernard Levy Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
100I am looking at it as a short term buy. Like you I am watching and do see the MJ-12/18/2002
99For which direction? BBands narrowed a bit, but looks like they are getting reaMeDroogies-12/18/2002
98Putting this on my watch list. Just checking in. mj(not Mark Johnson)MJ-12/18/2002
97I'd say it was the market...take a look at the last bull run in August...it MeDroogies-11/1/2002
96Cant really lay todays monster gain on the pull of the market. No news to speak w molloy-11/1/2002
95Wish I knew...probably just the pull of the market on a small cap.MeDroogies-10/10/2002
94CNXT announce its earnings call today (for Oct 22nd) and after sliding all week,w molloy-10/10/2002
93Has anyone heard anything from CNXT since they presented at the hardware confereMeDroogies-5/3/2002
92Looking like CNXT is having a mini breakout. Past the 50 day EMA...that usuallyMeDroogies-3/6/2002
91CNXT, should it close above 12.25, would be sending a bullish signal. Only one MeDroogies-3/5/2002
90Merrill Lynch & Co. 12 February, 2002 Yesterday, RF Micro Devices introduceSkeet Shipman-2/13/2002
89BTW, I forgot to mention, I'm an Eagles fan, and I went to Syracuse UniversiMeDroogies-1/17/2002
88What's up with this sucker now? I know everyone is worried about a double MeDroogies-1/15/2002
87MeD, All you have to do is look at their charts longer term and see that they aMcNabb Brothers-12/27/2001
86Interestingly, they responded that they checked my complaint out and said that tMeDroogies-12/27/2001
85Well, I put in a request to their webmaster to explain it. I don't tradeMeDroogies-12/21/2001
84I can tell you right now that it is wrong looking at the two different charts! McNabb Brothers-12/20/2001
83I know the diff between EMA and simple MA. I work with EMA because it eliminateMeDroogies-12/20/2001
82MeD, The EMA means Exponential Moving Avg. which is different than just the movMcNabb Brothers-12/20/2001
81Check Clear Station...I use EMA. Graph shows the bounce very clearly. If theirMeDroogies-12/20/2001
80MeD, 200 DMA is $10.46 50 DMA is $13.37 9 day exponential MA is $15.33 59 daMcNabb Brothers-12/20/2001
79I must have typed improperly yesterday, because we bounced right off the 200 dayMeDroogies-12/20/2001
78Buying at this level, no I wouldn't either, which is why I sold the Dec 15 cMeDroogies-12/19/2001
77The sector is weak and was dealt another blow by TQNT's warnings. The mergeThe Ox-12/19/2001
76Due to? Did something come out that I missed? Or are you just referring to marMeDroogies-12/19/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News