SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Momenta Pharmaceuticals Inc.
An SI Board Since March 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3027 64 0 MNTA
Emcee:  michael_f_murphy Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1002No, read the article, guys. >> “Date” refers to expiration month of peak tuck-4/25/2007
1001Yes Jim, that was what they did and your logic on why is impeccable, as always. Robohogs-4/25/2007
1000Jon, I think what they were doing is backing into the dates by where IV peaked.IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-4/25/2007
999The dates on several of the companies look wrong by the way. NRMX should be in nRobohogs-4/25/2007
998Pulled from Biotech short thread compliments of IDOS: Sunday, April 22, 2007 ShIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-4/24/2007
997SI for April is 8.77M down from March's 8.86M or about 90K shares. That is IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-4/24/2007
996I priced out synthetic shorts this morning and they were about 1% off the then pRobohogs-4/23/2007
995FIDO now has 10,000+ shares available to short. That is the normal figure. MayIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-4/23/2007
994Sanofi Blood Thinner Better Than Older Drug -Study Fri Apr 20, 2007 6:02 AM BST tnsaf-4/23/2007
993May straddle is at 25% of stock price and June is over 50%. Wow. JonRobohogs-4/21/2007
992Must be a smart family :-) Item 1.01. Entry into a Material Definitive Agrerkrw-4/20/2007
991Pretty big volume in the May 1.50 and 15 puts. Sellers or buyers? I sold some Rocky9-4/20/2007
990FIDO - available to short 579 ITM April call OI 8,163 ITM April calls traded yeIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-4/20/2007
989I have always heard it was much simpler before that great philandering Arkansan Robohogs-4/20/2007
988(OT) <i>doing it on the Internal Revenue Code</i> I still rememberBiomaven-4/19/2007
987I was going to ask how much the lawyers are making out of all this, and then I rtom pope-4/19/2007
986Thanks DD and Tuck, I read both. This class of interpretation is similar to doIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-4/19/2007
985Interesting dig there, Dew. Here's the Cliff Notes version for those who wotuck-4/19/2007
984The FDA generic-Norvasc ruling may be of interest to readers of this board: fdaDewDiligence_on_SI-4/19/2007
983I would assume a leak to one of the analysts. JonRobohogs-4/19/2007
982<i>But should teva get a flat out no I think it would become public recordDewDiligence_on_SI-4/19/2007
981And 3 insiders sold shares today including Whoriskey. Why doesn't she just rrkrw-4/18/2007
980Agree with you no need for teva to pr since their chances for approval are so slrkrw-4/18/2007
979<i>I think if [TEVA] got a flat "no" they would likely disclose DewDiligence_on_SI-4/18/2007
978Stock up again, but options seem to be relatively normal. Short term one (AprilRocky9-4/18/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):