SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
SI - DeathWAG
An SI Board Since February 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
151 16 0
Emcee:  Jorj X Mckie Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
101Hi TED, So you grabbed the double zero, and I'll take the palindrome... KJEL KABONG!!!-5/16/2001
100Who, me? Nah. That would be too easy. TEDTEDennis-5/16/2001
99set, set, anybody need a set?mr.mark-5/16/2001
98re: acknowledge existence. You darned well better !! I post, therefore, I am. TEDennis-5/16/2001
97Damn! I was found out! I guess that I have to acknowledge your existence now.Jorj X Mckie-5/16/2001
96Well, you little turkey ... You supreme low life. You purposely didn't copyTEDennis-5/16/2001
9503/07/99 mrmark (that's my story and i'm sticking to it) 02/25/01 marcos-4/15/2001
9403/07/99 mrmark (that's my story and i'm sticking to it) 02/25/01 Mr. BJorj X Mckie-4/13/2001
93Interesting news: investorshub.comJorj X Mckie-4/11/2001
92Update: The average from 3-10-01 (15,479,304) to 04-02-01 (15,603,336), inclusiWTMHouston-4/3/2001
91Or to allude to bricks in another kind of wall, but still very fitting... liter(Bob) Zumbrunnen-3/30/2001
90Sung to the tune of "Another Brick in the Wall" Message 15571898 <Jorj X Mckie-3/28/2001
89Whopping big total of 6 threads on the new threads list right now.CatLady-3/24/2001
88Take the blue pill. The story ends. You wake up in your bed and believe...whatevCheeky Kid-3/13/2001
87Do you guys know this thread is showing up on the INSP page? Pretty cool!mikiespeedracer-3/13/2001
86We are looking for Sub 500 to determine the winner of the Deathwag. I actually Jorj X Mckie-3/13/2001
85It was running really fast for me last night. I mean REALLY FAST!!! Specifical(Bob) Zumbrunnen-3/13/2001
84It does drive home the point though. No need to apologize.Jorj X Mckie-3/13/2001
83Apologies, Jorj; I meant the question to be rhetorical given the performance ofGVTucker-3/13/2001
82By the definition that I set up in the header, yes, that would qualify. -------Jorj X Mckie-3/13/2001
81If they kept the website but nobody posted because it worked so horrendously, woGVTucker-3/13/2001
80They'll never close it down, just let things break until it's unusable. CatLady-3/13/2001
79Message 15479095 To:Anthony@Pacific who wrote (68096) From: peter michaelson FrCatLady-3/9/2001
7803/07/99 mrmark (that's my story and i'm sticking to it) 02/25/01 Mr. BDScottD-3/8/2001
77maybe we should blame greenspan for the death of si...LMAOTim Luke-3/8/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News