SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Copper Fox
An SI Board Since February 2011
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10654 112 0 CUU
Emcee:  louel Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10104I think I will be placing a call to the OSC tomorrow regarding the irregular trabrundall24/13/2016
10103Well, the CarMax annual general meeting scheduled for April 27th in Vancouver wibrundall-4/13/2016
10102Its crazy cause it was just 2 weeks ago that I mentioned this company acts like Underhill69-4/13/2016
10101It was quite a boner. Today reminded me of "The Hawking Excitation" eTheotokos14/13/2016
10100I would think those who picked it up with all the work which has been done and plouel14/13/2016
10099A clean slate for the whole show. As 65% owners, CF management should be INTIMAHog Head-4/13/2016
10098My apologies. and I am no way defending the dufus that made this mistake and thumahzman2-4/13/2016
10097CXM raised $1.5M in December. It was slated to be spent on this summers prolouel24/13/2016
10096How is this for perverse logic. This fiasco might actually be good for CUU. Itmudguy14/13/2016
10095CXM is one issue, but it will be interesting to see how OSC deals with CUU and tmudguy-4/13/2016
10094MAZ I don't think anyone glories in CUU being negligent in regard to keepinglouel34/13/2016
10093CUU and good news in the same phrase? Really?Tap66-4/13/2016
10092Well, whatever the reason, with CUU unhalted 750K shares have traded hands on pomudguy-4/13/2016
10091maybe it's being purchased at multiple the current sp by these guys! lol. gTap66-4/13/2016
10090Maybe spring break Easter etc and holidays put the boys in the holiday mode theyspecboy2012-4/13/2016
10089CXM haltedmudguy-4/13/2016
10088Well, at least the property now has some kind of value :)mudguy-4/13/2016
10087No prob Spec, we can always offer another PP of a few million shares and repurchTap66-4/13/2016
10086Only when EE will put his pants on.Tap66-4/13/2016
10085If its true that two individuals have already picked up the claims I doubt theirspecboy2012-4/13/2016
10084Well, assuming it was not a mistake on the part of the MTO, this appears to be amudguy-4/13/2016
10083Just seeing this. /facepalm/mudguy-4/13/2016
10082Hopefully for the shareholder's sake this turns out to be a false alarm. ThHog Head-4/13/2016
10081This is just too unbelievable. First us shareholders get slapped hard in the faUnderhill69-4/13/2016
10080And if its true these two individuals might be the next creators of a company exspecboy2012-4/13/2016
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News