SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Copper Fox
An SI Board Since February 2011
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10654 112 0 CUU
Emcee:  louel Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10129if they reverse it carmax person responsible for oversight should have to stand Underhill69-4/15/2016
10128Prospect putting up nice info on the other site.Reality is that the Gold Commissspecboy201234/15/2016
10127claims might get reversed, but the black eye that cxm will be sporting on their Underhill69-4/15/2016
10126I would think they have a good shot at getting them reversed.But one never knowsspecboy2012-4/15/2016
10125That didn't work... Here it is: ============================ Carmax's Hog Head-4/15/2016
10124News out: app.quotemedia.comHog Head-4/15/2016
10123Looks like no halt... Prospekt posted this on AG earlier: --------------------Hog Head14/15/2016
10122Just curious as to why the OSC vs the ASC or BCSC? Not that I am expecting timeminder-4/15/2016
10121Placed a call today at 3pm to the OSC regarding the non-halting of Copper Fox stbrundall34/14/2016
10120Possible ray of sunshine. MTO, they admin BC tenures, has placed unclaimed carmaStockowner-4/14/2016
10119How about $5m to $10M buy back. If they hold it till mineral prices return louel-4/14/2016
10118I'm wondering if I should get out now while this is still under the radar. Tap66-4/14/2016
10117These are all great thoughts but no matter what its not a free ride.Negotiating specboy2012-4/14/2016
10116I think there's a good possibility that they will flip the property back to explorationguy-4/14/2016
10115I was tied up for the afternoon yesterday, but I see the market traded almost 1.mudguy14/14/2016
10114I would not be surprised to see them keep the whole thing and proceed to developlouel14/14/2016
10113That was his Plan B.mahzman2-4/14/2016
10112Another great example of why investors are leaving the Canadian venture stocks aspecboy201224/13/2016
10111Here's a new presentation slide for Elmer to try out: [graphic]dsikorsk34/13/2016
10110Do you think they will quickly negotiate with cxm or wait and auction to highestUnderhill69-4/13/2016
10109Scott and Martindale are not greenhorns They has been involved in various mininglouel-4/13/2016
10108would love to hear don lindsay's uncensored comments on this fiasco. or eveUnderhill6914/13/2016
10107All I can say is I bet there are a lot of Jokes being made in the industry todayspecboy201214/13/2016
10106not so sure it will be simple negotiation to get claims back. The new owners haUnderhill69-4/13/2016
10105Great idea brundall.Not a word out of CUU today to let the unsuspecting buyers gspecboy2012-4/13/2016
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News