SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applix is back in action
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3014 28 0 APLX
Emcee:  Magnifique Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1014 Magnifique, have you looked at CYMI? if yes, what is your take on the stock. -EEric-3/20/1997
1013 Mike: thanks for your recent posts! you have a way of saying all the things IRobert K. Schott-3/20/1997
1012 To All: if you'd care to go to the recent news section here on SI, the latRobert K. Schott-3/20/1997
1011 Talk about selling climaxes--when it went 7 ask for the second time this am I wGary Burton-3/20/1997
1010 Well, I snuck in between groups and doubled up at 7 1/8. It was gratifying to Scott Maxwell-3/20/1997
1009 Hi Robert, <<perhaps Mr. Edwards has it right. I give "profesMichael Burry-3/20/1997
1008 CORRECTION: in my last post I stated that perhaps Mr. Edwards was right when hRobert K. Schott-3/20/1997
1007 Boa: stock is rebounding (at least last I looked!); up 3/16 on huge volume. maRobert K. Schott-3/20/1997
1006 Two huge institutional positions were sold this morning (350K, 374K)which shot strawberrypie-3/20/1997
1005 I'd prefer not to mention the firm without asking them first but it was oneG Edwards-3/19/1997
1004 G Edwards--which brokerage firm talked to mgt? What did the analyst write/say Gary Burton-3/19/1997
1003 G: primarily UNIX, though their programs can be run on NT and other o/s. I saRobert K. Schott-3/19/1997
1002 Mike: I couldn't agree more about risk vs. reward, which is why I plan to Robert K. Schott-3/19/1997
1001 Robert, You are giving the professionals too much credit. Why aren't you Michael Burry-3/19/1997
1000 Gary: thanks for the post. its reassuring to read that some fund (apparently)Robert K. Schott-3/19/1997
999 I thought I might try to make a contribution to this thread as I read it almostG Edwards-3/19/1997
998 <<Doesn't anyone else here smell a rat? As for the gamblers,I mean inMichael Burry-3/19/1997
997 Qtr end window dressing, inst low cash position means need to raise cash so selGary Burton-3/19/1997
996 Armin: today I went to the post office to next day air another check to my broRobert K. Schott-3/19/1997
995 That's the problem. MGMT is not saying anything. Doesn't anyone else heGeorge Sepetjian-3/19/1997
994 George S.: Not sure why you addressed these questions to me. On what basis a cphersh-3/19/1997
993 Geroge: in regard to the buying back of shares, the information that I have isRobert K. Schott-3/19/1997
992 Personally I have a very sick feeling in the pit of my stomach Why is this stoMadharry-3/19/1997
991 Mr. Schott, I cannot help but think this slide is precipitated by the 85% instMichael Burry-3/19/1997
990 Two questions. 1. When does the class-action lawsuit begin? 2. When does APLX George Sepetjian-3/19/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News