SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
MPPP - MP3.com
An SI Board Since May 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1116 29 0 MPPP
Emcee:  Walter Morton Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1016 <i>They reasoned that there is no practical benefit to the recording indudumbmoney-5/2/2000
1015 MP3.com's Legal Bills May Turn Out to Be Costly: David Wilson Princeton, StockDung-5/1/2000
1014 JLIHAI Who knows, there might still be a way for mppp to compromise and make aSBHX-5/1/2000
1013 The downside of a T-shirt is you can wear it or use it to wash your car. This JLIHAI-4/30/2000
1012 BTW, I am neither long nor short this stock and given the current situation it Kashish King-4/30/2000
1011 Let's say MP3 were to admit their interpretation of the law was faulty. TheKashish King-4/30/2000
1010 <i>Yes, it was the original purchase and copy by MP3 that is the problem.dumbmoney-4/30/2000
1009 Yes, it was the original purchase and copy by MP3 that is the problem. For thatKashish King-4/30/2000
1008 It's not straight forward copyright violation to purchase a license to use Kashish King-4/30/2000
1007 JLIHAI, You forget the stock certificates, they'll have some historical vaSBHX-4/30/2000
1006 Joe Mintz, How true. I can remember the BreX days when some investors are <SBHX-4/30/2000
1005 Rod Macpherson said: >> if you want to argue that the initial set of CDs Rocky Reid-4/30/2000
1004 <i>Now, I know you agree with that last statement, and by extension you hdumbmoney-4/30/2000
1003 Dumb, <i>Fair use applies in cases that would otherwise be considered cKashish King-4/30/2000
1002 Jack, MPPP is more a technology company than a retailer. Listen to the recent cJosef Block-4/30/2000
1001 <i>Noone uses MPPP<--wher you can get al the crappy miusic you want foJack Hartmann-4/30/2000
1000 <<T-shirt>> That could be the most logical way to play this from tJLIHAI-4/30/2000
999 I knowe a lawyer that has screwed up so bad, nothing can protect him....IAnthony@Pacific-4/30/2000
998 These points have been interesting. Obviously, we don't know exactly what Joe Mintz-4/30/2000
997 I'm not sure. This protection of music copywrite was an issue back when tapOak Tree-4/30/2000
996 The lawyers never lose. They win when a bad deal is formed they win when they hOak Tree-4/30/2000
995 post #s 855, 860, 863, and 866Tim McCormick-4/30/2000
994 <i>They profit from the copying service, and the availability of the servdumbmoney-4/30/2000
993 <i>They profit from the copying service, and the availability of the servKashish King-4/30/2000
992 >>I have an MP3.com t-shirt. Perhaps in five years it will be a collectorRocky Reid-4/30/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News