SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Presstek -- Stock of the Decade??
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11098 20 0 PRST
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10198 What Swing, Scott??? This stock is dead. No one cares. You can scream about plpaul abramowitz-11/17/1998
10197 Abromoschitz, you say, "Did you buy in the 7s today". No, but maybe SG-11/17/1998
10196 Hey stupid, every one of my "bromo" posts follows one of his "wrSG-11/17/1998
10195 Goaway Gallowsway, Look, you loser, why do you continue with the "AbromostJames C. Shircliff-11/17/1998
10194 Wrongway: Wakeup!! The largest short run color market is runs of 500 and underpaul abramowitz-11/16/1998
10193 GV, the machine in question has a much smaller footprint than the qm-di. IT IS SG-11/16/1998
10192 Scott, the target market for the Heidelberg/Kodak JV Nonimpact press is for runGVTucker-11/16/1998
10191 GV, you say, <<Scott, you obviously haven't done much research intoSG-11/16/1998
10190 Wrongway: 1st, I was responding to Neils questions. 2nd: you state: "Juspaul abramowitz-11/16/1998
10189 <<That office size desktop machine you refer to is not a 4 color short, mGVTucker-11/16/1998
10188 GV, you and Paul are still holding on to the same issue of old. That office sizSG-11/16/1998
10187 NEIL, I have never made it a practice to discuss my specific position on PresstGVTucker-11/16/1998
10186 'I think they install our system so as to survive,' he says. 'ThereSG-11/16/1998
10185 Yawn. Scott, you were not around two years ago. We have already seen that "James C. Shircliff-11/15/1998
10184 Paul, you say, "whose major customer just chose a competing technology???&SG-11/14/1998
10183 Neil, in reply and imo: "1. What is your anticipated outlook for this copaul abramowitz-11/14/1998
10182 Dear Neil, I'll help you out. You are referring to the business about &quJames C. Shircliff-11/14/1998
10181 To all Presstek Bears: ....SURVEY.... In regards to my prior posts. I am intNEIL MACK-11/13/1998
10180 Sorry James....although I was unable to find the time to go back and research oNEIL MACK-11/13/1998
10179 Scott, Your latest messages sum you up very well. I knew from your writings tJames C. Shircliff-11/13/1998
10178 Neil, Putting words into other people's mouths is not sanitary. You utteredJames C. Shircliff-11/12/1998
10177 James, You made the statement: "Neil, you were obviously not paying any atNEIL MACK-11/12/1998
10176 Wrongway: In response: "Show me one press article or news piece that sapaul abramowitz-11/12/1998
10175 Brent: You forgot its new management. It no longer x, y,or z, its "a"paul abramowitz-11/12/1998
10174 Scott, The dream IS STILL the same. 'Wait until next year. That's whBrent-11/12/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):