SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
NANO
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2272 39 0 NANO
Emcee:  Norrin Radd Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1022 JDN, What is the difference to talk about it now and after the earning report? Wade-9/20/1997
1021 Dear l. bernstein: If it breaks out the way I would like it too, I agree but lJDN-9/20/1997
1020 jdn: i think a split could happen. but you are right about timing. it's tosunshine-9/20/1997
1019 wade: it would be so nice if a split would happen. 2 for 1 is about right, but sunshine-9/20/1997
1018 The volatility of NANO is mainly due to the low volume of float which does not Wade-9/20/1997
1017 Dear Wade: I think there is zero chance of company spliting this stock at thisJDN-9/20/1997
1016 The speard is about 0.25 point at any time. But, it still depend on the volume Wade-9/20/1997
1015 jdn: here's to good numbers <eom>sunshine-9/14/1997
1014 wade: <<I do not want to say that number in public for many reasonssunshine-9/14/1997
1013 Hi, The Prudential forecast is $0.82(as I can recall) for 98. What will the PE Wade-9/14/1997
1012 Dear L. bernstein and all: Lets wait and see what the numbers show for 9/30. JDN-9/14/1997
1011 wade, you said, Naturally, the higher the entry point is, the higher the risk wsunshine-9/14/1997
1010 Wade, be happy that You were early. After this runup... regards, CROSSYCrossy-9/14/1997
1009 Hi Crossy, Naturally, the higher the entry point is, the higher the risk will bWade-9/14/1997
1008 Wade, I'm trying to clear up my view on NANO. Could be interesting, but ceCrossy-9/14/1997
1007 Crossy, We are looking for the stocks having the highest return potential with Wade-9/13/1997
1006 Correction: management owns 68% of the stock, according to IBD. I said that Pdan serachitopol-9/13/1997
1005 Dale, on General Lithography thread, Andrew Vance doesn't seem to like NANOCrossy-9/13/1997
1004 I think the management really isn't concerned about shareholder value or thFollies-9/13/1997
1003 Dear Dan: Well when 9/30 earnings come out we will see just how conservative PJDN-9/13/1997
1002 Dear Kevin: Could that "someone" be you???haha. JDNJDN-9/13/1997
1001 Yes, some big guys entered the game lately Friday and helped NANO up. Looking adan serachitopol-9/12/1997
1000 Someone was really desperate to buy NANO in the last few minutes of trading todHoatzin-9/12/1997
999 Sounds like a good move, Wade. NANO Sure looks undervalued compared with some oDuane L. Olson-9/8/1997
998 JDN--- Very true,,,, not long to wait. On the other hand--- the only limitatioCaptain Jack-9/8/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):