SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applied Magnetics Corp
An SI Board Since September 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12298 24 0 APM
Emcee:  Raymond Thomas Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10298 T.R. I'm with ya, pal. I bailed this morning at a loss. Also, bailed out Chris Anderson-11/11/1997
10297 Jonathon, can't argue with that. Anyone else see something in the convertibFuzzFace-11/11/1997
10296 Ironic....about two hours ago I said I was still hanging in there and didn'T.R.-11/11/1997
10295 I think some of the shorts have already started covering. We will see for afterJoe S Pack-11/11/1997
10294 Edwin, Yes i think you are right about the shorting done at 30. But im also noJonathan Bird-11/11/1997
10293 I capitulated yesterday and sold my shares at 18 3/8. Probably amateurish on mHelios-11/11/1997
10292 Deb holding shorters won't cover until they see a rock hard bottom. It'Peter Yang-11/11/1997
10291 Jonathon, If I recall correctly, they did the shorting in the 30's not at 1FuzzFace-11/11/1997
10290 I, too, would have liked an earnings warning, and would not have bought anotherpeter ashley-11/11/1997
10289 <<To my understanding, we should have support below 18.5, because that isJonathan Bird-11/11/1997
10288 Edwin, I was wondering the same thing. I think I might have even posted on theBrian Lempel-11/11/1997
10287 Anyone notice what price we got support around? Aren't the convertibles debFuzzFace-11/11/1997
10286 2P, your expansionist view is backward-looking. i.e. why need more than 64k? Greg Jung-11/11/1997
10285 >>you may very well get run over by a quick short squeeze.<< It woPeter Yang-11/11/1997
10284 i would surely consider buying back in for anything under 10 as there is a nicevirgil vancleave-11/11/1997
10283 Related News: 12:38 [WDC] WESTERN DIGITAL CUT TO NEUTRAL FROM BUY -- SANDS BMJR-11/11/1997
10282 that is why even though i like the company and think they are undervalued here,virgil vancleave-11/11/1997
10281 >>most people do not care the mr/non-mr drive, next people look at price,Dennis Jacobsen-11/11/1997
10280 Speaking of those drives, JTS just announced their new drives. Their prices arLiz Rivlin-11/11/1997
10279 50 megs might be handy for the next generation of webtvs, however the bandwidthJohn Ritter-11/11/1997
10278 Re: Why would anyone need 50 Megabytes of Storage? <i>Why would I want tProton-11/11/1997
10277 You forgot to add the CEO has watched the stock lose over 50% of it's valuejohn david martin-11/11/1997
10276 You all seem to lose fact that was is more expensive today will be much cheaperShane Stump-11/11/1997
10275 Guys...Your reasonings are ones I made at one time also, prior to APM's mosDwight E. Karlsen-11/11/1997
10274 I agree. I acquired a cdr to solve storage problem. I see the large drives as sJohn Cave-11/11/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News