SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
E-Mini Pit
An SI Board Since January 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
11288 150 0
Emcee:  the-phoenix Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10313Oh, sorry. Was there more of that to come? Be my guest. <G>the-phoenix-4/9/2003
10312Sure, ruin my fun and tell him he is useful. Sheesh...SE-4/9/2003
10311My pleasure....glad it's of some value.Doo-4/9/2003
10310It's probably time frame, to some degree. But, over the past few years I reDoo-4/9/2003
10309My target for today was 865, so I covered all at four o'clock. However, aftethe-phoenix-4/9/2003
10308I love how you challenge us other traders to think about what we are doing, BTW.the-phoenix-4/9/2003
10307<i>How much discretion you want to exercise in the trade, and how a misusethe-phoenix-4/9/2003
10306Today's been a fairly busy day. Partial cover at 870... I still have some Londo-4/9/2003
10305The percentages I referred to were pure SPX moves, i.e. 1% adverse move in SPX (Londo-4/9/2003
10304hehe....just doing my part. lolDoo-4/9/2003
10303For someone who is still "playing" this game (per your words in a prioSE-4/9/2003
103021, 2, 5% profits and risks of what? The margin that happens to be in your accouDoo-4/9/2003
10301The explanation makes sense, yes. "I see no point in being rigid about a tDoo-4/9/2003
10300<i>Do you two have profit targets on the trades you are taking</i> Londo-4/9/2003
10299I can't speak for Londo, of course, but the experiences that I have had thatthe-phoenix-4/9/2003
10298I could well be reading too much into this topic, but is there some "homeruDoo-4/9/2003
10297I agree with that natural reaction part. I have the same problem of tightening sthe-phoenix-4/9/2003
10296Stops be damned = The information that I got stopped out at 887.25 (high of day)Londo-4/9/2003
10295"...stops be damned." Huh?Doo-4/9/2003
10294Your reasons sound valid, except for SARS - I pretty much think that most of theLondo-4/9/2003
10293One other thing about futures trading that I found is that the most painful deciLondo-4/9/2003
10292In the "Newton's Third Law" department: A few days ago, I reporteLondo-4/9/2003
10291Londo: <i>is there anything other than technicals that you think could potthe-phoenix-4/9/2003
10290.jt47319-4/9/2003
10289This analysis (i.e. your assertions that VIX will head to 44-45 again) is based Londo-4/9/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):