SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applied Magnetics Corp
An SI Board Since September 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12298 24 0 APM
Emcee:  Raymond Thomas Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10348 Good detective work AT. I did find something that you missed though. Seems as Rob Fox-11/15/1997
10347 <<Since I'm not interested in trading this stock, the next two quarteJonathan Bird-11/15/1997
10346 >>WDC and APM are kind of joined at the hip right now. The major differenAlienTech-11/15/1997
10345 Was Chrisman the "guy" (respectively) everyone loved in August?. He Lou-11/14/1997
10344 Jon Bird: Since I'm not interested in trading this stock, the next two quaPaul Senior-11/14/1997
10343 RE>>IMO it was a good day to add to one's position in APM..<< Ali Khaman-11/14/1997
10342 >Anyway to ease my pain, do you have any comments on how we could have >fLoLoLoLita-11/14/1997
10341 <<IMO it was a good day to add to one's position in APM... which is wJonathan Bird-11/14/1997
10340 J.P. "Don't feel like a pair of brown loafers with a tuxedo..." T.R.-11/14/1997
10339 Well I'm back in "again". Jumped out on the down slide but back RoadWarrior-11/14/1997
10338 Dennis, I believe there is most profit in buying unpopular situations on the chGreg Jung-11/14/1997
10337 IMO it was a good day to add to one's position in APM... which is what IPaul Senior-11/14/1997
10336 Greg, A very instructive post, especially for a newbie like me. In fact many oDennis Jacobsen-11/13/1997
10335 17! What the f**ck happened while I was gone! Jeez, at least I made a coupleJ. P.-11/13/1997
10334 To answer your question about the screwed down DD, several mgrs make mounting tThomas George Warner-11/13/1997
10333 Greg: THAT POST is one excellent review. I have printed it to study it. BTW The Duke of URL©-11/13/1997
10332 *** OFF TOPIC **** I appreciate your comments...however...I'll be gone onlT.R.-11/13/1997
10331 Greg - you sez "APM now has a monopoly on the TFI-1.7g it might as well beBosco-11/13/1997
10330 <i>According the Crisman TFI head is $8 and a MR head is $11.</i> jas cooper-11/13/1997
10329 I should hope so. NEAR is the keyword. Qualification ok, but production yieldGreg Jung-11/13/1997
10328 Duke, here's the story of APM (shortened) APM and WDC made decision a wGreg Jung-11/13/1997
10327 One more thing, a recent Prudent Speculator hotline said: "several other sjemmeri-11/13/1997
10326 >Are you sure he still sees it the same way? Dennis, I don't know if yosjemmeri-11/13/1997
10325 According the Crisman TFI head is $8 and a MR head is $11. Regards, Seppokormac-11/13/1997
10324 Check out IBM's web page.. I didn't bookmark the page, but the informaDennis Nicks-11/13/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):