SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Imclone systems (IMCL)
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2515 89 0 IMCL
Emcee:  Deeber Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1040 Hold on to your shares..You will be happy. David Faber on CNBC did a butcher jomanny t-10/7/1999
1039 Doesn't look like the conference call assurred anyone of anything. Anyone 613-10/7/1999
1038 The deal cannot be priced at greater than the market price, and NO ONE knows whchalu2-10/7/1999
1037 Here ya go........ biz.yahoo.com <i>Thursday October 7, 6:03 am Easternxcr600-10/7/1999
1036 DID YOU GUYS EVER HEAR OF A QUITE PERIOD. IMCL IS IN ONE NOW. RELAX THESE ARE TJim-10/7/1999
1035 Looking at Thompson I-watch, 3/4 of the pie was institutions, this worries me.Brandon Buttons-10/6/1999
1034 A sharp drop on low volume or in a soft market is one thing. But IMCL is plungicirrus-10/6/1999
1033 Well, someone knows something that we don't. How else can you explain the rxcr600-10/6/1999
1032 This patent issue was already described in the original S-3 filed on Sept. 21. Saulamanca-10/6/1999
1031 I don't know that much about drugs, but I don't think this is that big Wes Stevens-10/6/1999
1030 Jim, QUIET WON was recommending IMCL as a strong buy when it was at about 10 buLTK007-10/6/1999
1029 Not short. With high volm, now news, and tanking, wondering what the heck is gQuietWon-10/6/1999
1028 IMO, drop is much too severe to be from shorting. Secondary was announced Sept xcr600-10/6/1999
1027 Scott is correct. The public offering for 2.5M shares does not set well with inEdscharp-10/6/1999
1026 Could it be this? Seems like a bit of over reaction at this point. Could use soxcr600-10/6/1999
1025 QuietWon, Why did you feel it necessary to send this message to three threads?Jim Spitz-10/6/1999
1024 IMCL: Yah, where is that Jim McCamant now to say "there's one larger sQuietWon-10/6/1999
1023 Imclone filed amended registration statement today as regards their secondary WYD-10/6/1999
1022 why are we tanking? BC-10/6/1999
1021 "When you see that phrase infecting a thread, it's time to head for thEdscharp-10/6/1999
1020 >><i>My least favorite phrase is, "It's a buying opportunitom pope-10/6/1999
1019 Genentech was hammered, and the whole group went down. My least favorite phraseFred Levine-10/6/1999
1018 Thanks for the info on today's action. HMMMMMM!?! gregGreg Rich-10/5/1999
1017 There were two tanks on high volume (the day as a whole was a huge volume day) tom pope-10/5/1999
1016 ALL: Anyone have information about the big drop this AM. I fired up my browseGreg Rich-10/5/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News