SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
PLNI - Game Over
An SI Board Since November 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12518 29 0 PLNIQ
Emcee:  Captain James T. Kirk Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10468For very good reason. I have no direct information as to who was involved in therrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
10467Let's see - you seem to have strong opinions and you seem to know a lot abouscion-7/6/2007
10466The motions for deposition were pointed at two contested items. Were any items irrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
10465I believe I did stick to the subject. I was just trying to get your opinion on trrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
10464What leads you to believe that "the Murphy team" was "satisfied&qscion-7/6/2007
10463Per your post, the meeting was not continued, so the Murphy team must have been rrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
10462Then stick to the subject of the board - Plasticon and Turek's business intescion-7/6/2007
10461I wonder which companies Turek listed? <i>The trustee may also ask how yoscion-7/6/2007
10460No need to control anything. Just trying to get a straight answer from the posterrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
10459The subject of the board is Plasticon and Turek and his business dealings, not yscion-7/6/2007
10458Yes... someone learns something new every day..rrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
10457<i>The trustee assigned to the case presides and asks questions about the scion-7/6/2007
10456Pretty common knowledge scion. I thought you would be aware that the debtor is srrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
10455h. Answering further, counsel for the Murphy Entities discussed more than two wescion-7/6/2007
10454Really? What evidence do you have to support that contention? <i>I am faiscion-7/6/2007
10453I made no such judgement as to right or wrong. I am fairly certain he was sworn rrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
10452Replying to a question not asked on this board? I doubt both your hypotheses. Irrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
10451Clearly you think that Turek was right to refuse to answer questions about the pscion-7/6/2007
10450Here is a hypothetical for you scion, if you were involved in a court case dispurrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
10449I doubt that he was advised not to comment on the patents at a Meeting of Creditscion-7/6/2007
10448Is there not a court case pending on the patents? You think he was advised not trrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
10447Jeff, care to explain how you got the background on Fitter? Are you in contact wrrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
10446I wonder why Turek refused to answer questions about the patents at the 'Meescion-7/6/2007
10445The largest backlog in their history... a losing company? Why was Murphy the onrrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
10444It is a shame that you see spooks everywhere. As for banning power... only Adminrrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News