SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
NANO
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2272 39 0 NANO
Emcee:  Norrin Radd Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1047 Dear Wade: The heck with the earnings. Tell me about the Salmon Fishing. WheJDN-9/29/1997
1046 I just got message from Mr. paul Nolan, CFO, that they will announce Q3 earningWade-9/29/1997
1045 Dear Sunshine andjml: I agree, but then its just a 2nd opinion. If it was subJDN-9/26/1997
1044 jdn: i've seen some other opinions on 2nd opinion. imo, this is just a prosunshine-9/26/1997
1043 wade, and all, does anyone know a date for earnings yet? <eom>sunshine-9/26/1997
1042 JDn, It is free for at this point. But, you can pay for it also which is 19.95/Wade-9/26/1997
1041 Dear Wade: Nothing we didnt already know but it is nice to have independent coJDN-9/26/1997
1040 sunshine, Agreed. The shrinking of volume and a mild pull back after a fast runWade-9/26/1997
1039 wade: i checked your link. they look very positive. personally, i don't fosunshine-9/26/1997
1038 Sunshine, Here is some positive news for NANO. Please check this "Second Wade-9/25/1997
1037 jdn: you got it! about 8 more days. but i don't expect it to break out forsunshine-9/22/1997
1036 Kevin, An old friend of mine told me that if the stock does not drop back to fiWade-9/22/1997
1035 Bob, >>Does anyone hear subscribe to the theory that stocks typically havHoatzin-9/22/1997
1034 Does anyone hear subscribe to the theory that stocks typically have to fill gapBob Richmann-9/22/1997
1033 Dear EG: Gosh, I wish it would (drift back to 10) but I think there is absolutJDN-9/22/1997
1032 Sorry for this off topic: ECGOF Tom, The projected earning for the next Q is 0Wade-9/22/1997
1031 off topic -- um, darn it, i was watching ecgof for a while, but sure didn'ttom pope-9/21/1997
1030 Off topic, Here is another one, ECGOF, which I think will become next USF. I enWade-9/21/1997
1029 Hi, I think 12.50 at here is a good support. I have experienced wide swings durWade-9/21/1997
1028 <i> Do you think it's going to drift back to 10+ instead? </i> Follies-9/21/1997
1027 Wade, Sure, 40 sounds great for the future, but I'm still waiting to see aE. Graphs-9/21/1997
1026 Hi dale and JDN, Points well taken. Glad to see $40 popped up. I thought I was Wade-9/21/1997
1025 Dear Wade: Stock now hovers around 13. I cant imagin a split at that low a leJDN-9/21/1997
1024 I think its way too early to think about a split. Many funds can't buy stoFollies-9/21/1997
1023 L and JDN, I spoke to Mr. P. Nolan. He mentioned NANO built a demo 8000 model lWade-9/21/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):