SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
PLNI - Game Over
An SI Board Since November 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12518 29 0 PLNIQ
Emcee:  Captain James T. Kirk Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10518A rhetorical question scion. I don't think they would do anything illegal rerrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
10517<i>(8 ) George W. Butter (sic) is listed on Debtor Plasticon’s SOFA, questscion-7/6/2007
10516h. First National Bank of Barnesville (“FNBB”) (1) In James N. Turek, Sr.’s Affscion-7/6/2007
10515Why would you think that KING & SCHICKLI, PLLC would do anything illegal?scion-7/6/2007
10514Assignment: 8 Reel/Frame: 014805/0504 Recorded: 07/01/2004 Pages: 3 Conveyascion-7/6/2007
10513You are probably correct. Do you suppose they would do something that was illegarrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
10512I'm sure this firm has records of all the assignments. KING & Schickli,scion-7/6/2007
10511Again, a completely different litigation. I haven't a clue and wouldn't rrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
10510Tell us how Assigment 7 came about. Assignor: AZTEC CONCRETE ACCESSORIES, INscion-7/6/2007
10509V. < MAKING THE ASSIGNMENT OF RECORD An assignment can be made of recordscion-7/6/2007
10508Well, one of us is certainly not current... As of 6/16/2006 <i>Patent # rrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
10507You're not keeping up with your reading are you? I suggest you spend more tiscion-7/6/2007
10506There are many questions concerning the First National Bank Of Barnsville and thscion-7/6/2007
10505And you know that so definitively because... ???? You seem to be very assertiverrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
10504You know, assignment 6 was in 1999 and assignment 8 was in 2004. The Bank was prrrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
10503SO? It still has to be registered at the USPTO. Why do you think the First Bank scion-7/6/2007
10502Here is a quote you can google... <i>An assignment, grant, or conveyance rrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
10501Did you miss Assignment 6? Murphy's lawyers didn't. Message 23679726scion-7/6/2007
10500And you know that so definitively because... ???? <i>Murphy's lawyersrrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
10499Still clutching at straws? What defines "ownership" then? Assignmentscion-7/6/2007
10498I know that. <i>You are asking the wrong stockholder.</i> Murphy&#scion-7/6/2007
10497Change of assignee at USPTO doesn't necessarily define ownership. Bank of Barrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
10496Message 23653548scion-7/6/2007
10495You're beginning to sound like Perry Mason scion. You are asking the wrong srrm_bcnu-7/6/2007
10494No recent changes in the assignment of Patent #:4942714 assignments.uspto.gov scion-7/6/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News