SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Momenta Pharmaceuticals Inc.
An SI Board Since March 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3027 64 0 MNTA
Emcee:  michael_f_murphy Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1052thanks! Rickscaram(o)uche-5/1/2007
1051Slide 28 on the slide show has under 2H 2007 guidance assumptions: Metroprolol Robohogs-5/1/2007
1050It deals with fails to deliver, which are created all along the trail of legitimscaram(o)uche-5/1/2007
1049They did have Toprol still listed as pending also on slide 18. Jon PS I will Robohogs-5/1/2007
1048I was under the impression that Reg SHO dealt with Naked Shorting.Ian@SI-5/1/2007
1047The key to that slide in my mind is the Level 2 header - "Over 70 ANDAs <Robohogs-5/1/2007
1046On prior CC’s, WPI has talked extensively about Toprol XL and hardly at all abouDewDiligence_on_SI-5/1/2007
1045They did have generic lovenox or toprol from 2H. JonRobohogs-5/1/2007
1044<i>TEVA is near its highs of the day, FWIW.</i> Probably nothing toDewDiligence_on_SI-5/1/2007
1043According to Brian Lawler of Motley Fool, WPI said in their January conference ctuck-5/1/2007
1042WPI slide show: library.corporate-ir.net See #18 detailing claim to Lovenox viIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-5/1/2007
1041No, I've never seen any evidence of naked shorting in mnta. Never mentionedscaram(o)uche-5/1/2007
1040Watson conference call at 5 pm, Eastern. The routine quarterly call.scaram(o)uche-5/1/2007
1039The immediate WPI move had me thinking I did not see news - nothing out yet but Robohogs-5/1/2007
1038Wo, hadn't looked! Be interesting to see how much of that is in OI tomorrowscaram(o)uche-5/1/2007
1037>>I'm curious about how long they've been showing generic Lovenox IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-5/1/2007
1036Now Rick, you wouldn't be suggesting that Naked Shorts might spread false ruIan@SI-5/1/2007
1035Would the shorts have used it or pressed the bet with those puts - monster 15 voRobohogs-5/1/2007
1034I'm curious about how long they've been showing generic Lovenox in projescaram(o)uche-5/1/2007
1033Thanks - never a dull stock , this one. It remains on the Reg SHO list so no noIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-5/1/2007
1032Wow. We haven't even discussed Watson here. But a glance around shows thattuck-5/1/2007
1031They are, but as you've now read, Andrx/Watson has marketing rights for theiscaram(o)uche-5/1/2007
1030That is new to me. Thought they were a private company. ijIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-5/1/2007
1029Yeah - what an idiot I am. Must be fact I woke up to get water and saw this. NRobohogs-5/1/2007
1028Watson bought Andrx. Andrx had deal with Amphastar. Watson had sales for L ikenhott-5/1/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):